Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2012

File:Gehry Medienhafen 7th floor.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Feb 2012 at 18:46:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by H005 - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 18:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Joyradost (talk) 16:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong color manipulation and overexposed. Mostly because of post processing. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼苦情処理係 18:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- I don't know what to do. I want to support the excellent idea but find the composition somehow unbalanced. I wonder if bringing the vertical lines to the vertical would help. Also, the manipulation seems a bit excessive. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- PS -- There is something else I don't like: the proportions look wrong; the composition would improve with a generous crop at the top. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you use it in main? Przykuta → [edit] 16:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't understand the question. Tomer T (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't see this photo in other Wikimedia projects in main space. This is an example of architecture of... Przykuta → [edit] 16:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is good for abstract.Trongphu (talk) 00:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Niabot. --Yikrazuul (talk) 12:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Niabot. --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 22:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tahrir Square on July 29 2011.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 00:01:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ahmed Abd El-Fatah - uploaded by The Egyptian Liberal - nominated by The Egyptian Liberal -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 00:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support A high quality valued photo. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 00:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- I don't think that the documental value mitigates the terrible image quality. The photograph is overexposed, there are strange concentric artifacts on the sky, vigneting, dust spots and the geometric distortion is excessive. How could it be possible to obtaing this result with such a good camera? Part of the problem is the automatic exposure choice but it doesn't explain everything. Sorry. Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: because of very poor image quality -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:VAZ-2101 (ВАЗ-2101 Жигули) , Tallinn.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Feb 2012 at 17:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What about the trailer on the right side? It's a caravan, a boat or what? --Llorenzi (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is motorboat -> [1] --Pudelek (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me just a car with a not convincing background, no wow! --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose distracting background, bad composition. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing special for featured.Trongphu (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:YuMZ-6KL tractor 2011 G2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 06:46:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nothing original--David საქართველო 10:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Correct picture (though the subject should be on the left side imo), good image quality but nothing fancy justitying the FP status. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice quality but very ordinary. I expect more from featured pictures.Trongphu (talk) 00:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lake at Dusk in November.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 09:59:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Photos public domain.com - uploaded by Dipankan001 - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 09:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dipankan001 (talk) 09:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too dark--Llorenzi (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ voting once is enough... --mathias K 19:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC) That is what it is...It's a sunset. Dipankan001 (talk) 08:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support it is dark because of the sunrise (or sunset), in my opinion this is what makes it interesting. If it was not "dark" it would be boring.--Joyradost (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Confusing composition, too dark, the foregound should be focused. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The reflection in water and the reflection of the sunlight in the cloud makes it look so brilliant. Dipankan001 (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo, but nothing special, just another sunset. Foreground out of focus. -- Achird (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose same as above.Trongphu (talk) 00:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --mathias K 19:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common Jezebel Delias eucharis by kadavoor 2.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 10:14:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor - nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose compression artifacts attributable to the camera --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- A marvelous butterfly but a terrible image quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- could you explain a bit more?
- Sure. As Carschten already mentioned the problem are the compression artifacts. Not only in the background, where they appear like small geometric figures "invented" by the compression algorithm but also in the subject, where they affect the detail and sharpness. Always choose the maximum possible resolution and image quality, especially when using compact cameras with small sensors. Please take a look at the present featured pictures of insect (and butterflies) in our galleries to have a idea of what kind of quality is required. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:46, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Rimgård 2012b.gif

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 10:32:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Animated image demonstrating the rule of thirds. Photo by ArildV, animation by Yjenith, nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 10:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 10:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why the animation?--Llorenzi (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Educational point to show both the original image, and how the image is composed.--ArildV (talk) 14:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:41, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose posterization --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even GIF animations can support more then 256 colors (even so it is of minimum standard). This drastic color reduction destroys the image for me. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼苦情処理係 18:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Its a good point. I have ask for help here to do a new version.--ArildV (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Not the best illustration of the rule of the thirds (the subject should be smaller) and a poor composition considering the direction of the motion: the player should be on the left side of the frame. Also, I don't see the need for the animation and alternation betweeen color and bw. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--ArildV (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trombidium holosericeum LC0127.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Feb 2012 at 19:22:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Velvet mite (Trombidium holosericeum). Found that 2mm girl climbing between the roots of an old tree and enjoying the warm sping sun. Created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
Support -- LC-de (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Nice catch of a very small animal and good encyclopaedic value. But the flat light (flah?) and unfocused parts in the foreground (leg and branch) spoil the nomination. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Difficult to keep the whole thing in focus --Paolo Costa (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice.Trongphu (talk) 00:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 03:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:56, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Thatcheria mirabilis 01.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2012 at 06:50:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful as usual --Schnobby (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome as usual. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 18:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support awesome as usual. This user deserves the master of shell as the title :D.Trongphu (talk) 23:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 03:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

File:Autumn landscape near Gullesfjordbotn, Hinnøya, 2010 September.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2012 at 22:53:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info An Autumn view near Gullesfjordbotn in Hinnøya island, Troms, Northern Norway in 2010 September. Created, uploaded & nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ximonic (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ -- Sorry but the color manipulation is excessive. Even the clouds are yellow! Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I haven't manipulated the colors that much. I have dropped some saturation, but the yellowish clouds are probably caused by lower exposure for the upper sky. No HDR, just layer work and aligned different exposures... Should I still take off some yellows? --Ximonic (talk) 13:02, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Really nice, I love autumn. - A.Savin 13:13, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done I slightly changed the white balance. Alvesgaspar had a good point anyway. --Ximonic (talk) 13:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Better now. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Myrabella (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive, dramatic landscape --ELEKHH^T 08:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Simonic. --Cayambe (talk) 11:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice atmosphere. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support great work IMHO --LC-de (talk) 12:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive --PierreSelim (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 16:17:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created , uploaded and nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 16:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Some of you might wonder why I chose this point of view, and not a really frontal one. Two reasons: I wanted to be closer, and I wanted the head of the central statue to be clear using the black background of the upper part of the stain glass window.
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 16:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry but the angle is not really the best. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Which angle would you choose? for the next time... --Kadellar (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad crop, need a perspective correction. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- IMHO, a perspective correction would look unreal. --Kadellar (talk) 18:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Then the crop or composition is not ok. Lines of the buildings are cut-off, and it looks bad. However I think Alchemist-hp is right. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm going to try a perspective correction, and then I'll tell you the results. --Kadellar (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have just tried a perspective correction. It doesn't look so unreal as I expected, but on the other hand I have to cut off most of the arch above the rose. I think it's worse. --Kadellar (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose doesn't attract me enough.Trongphu (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't want to sound rude at all and sorry if it seems so, but your comment is just like "I don't like it" with other words. --Kadellar (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edo Panorama old Tokyo color photochrom.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 21:40:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Felice Beato - uploaded by Horst-schlaemma - nominated by Tael -- Pierre Rudloff (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre Rudloff (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice photochrom. Tomer T (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question this image is colored by a specialized software? Ggia (talk) 10:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a software, it is a photochrom. The original image is here. --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 15:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMO the photochrom ads very little to the image. If the distortions could be corrected it would be great, otherwise I prefer the original image. --G Furtado (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job. I was impressed when I saw in the description that this is Tokyo 150 years ago. --Lošmi (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose strange and unrealistic sky and strange light effects, restoration could be done better --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support it looks unrealistic because the original image was really in bad shape. This is already very impressive restoration. Yep it can be better but as for now it deserves featured.Trongphu (talk) 00:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Trongphu, and because the panorama is near 150 years old. -- Achird (talk) 19:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose kitschy photochrome rendering of the original, with strange sky. Also not properly documented: if photochrom was invented in the 1880s than hardly can this image be from 1865. --ELEKHH^T 09:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have a point here. I suppose the original is from 1865 and the photochrom is from later. --Pierre Rudloff (talk) 13:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:39, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Neophema chrysogaster male - Melaleuca.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 04:41:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by JJ Harrison -- JJ Harrison (talk) 04:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excluding any new birds after the breeding season, this is one of 21 wild Orange-bellied Parrots, making it perhaps the rarest wild bird in the world. -- JJ Harrison (talk) 04:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The article on enwiki is pretty interesting. It is a rare bird, and also a very exotic, colorful bird. Sometimes rare species are not beautiful at all, but in this case we have a gorgeous bird... which reminds me of the Bornean rainbow toad, thought to be extinct, and found again after some 90 years. Most beautiful frog I've seen. It is a real pity Wikipedia doesn't have the picture [2] on the article. --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 14:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:19, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 22:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 20:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 12:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Popocatepetl pasodecortez cut.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2012 at 01:28:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Cvmontuy - uploaded by Cvmontuy - nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, but a bit on the dark side. --Paolo Costa (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cvmontuy ( I thought that could not vote) (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose much to dark --LC-de (talk) 22:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support epic landscape.Trongphu (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Poor image quality, little detail, too dark, blue casting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:31, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Coat of Arms of Hawaii.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2012 at 04:39:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sodacan - uploaded by Sodacan - nominated by Connormah -- Connormah (talk | contribs) 04:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - image with high encyclopedic value, possibly one of the highest quality renderings out there. -- Connormah (talk | contribs) 04:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ginés90 (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:58, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 08:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support good one!Trongphu (talk) 00:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really an excellent work! Jacopo Werther (talk) 14:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support odder (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Setting sun at the lake.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2012 at 09:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Photos public domain - uploaded by Dipankan001 - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 09:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dipankan001 (talk) 09:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice but it has only limited value to Commons, so it's YaSP (Yet another Sunset Picture). IMHO the sun's to bright here too. --LC-de (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clipping of both light and dark. The sun and its reflection are just too painful to look at, and there's not enough visibility of the birds on the water. In the end, it is just another sunset. Colin (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not good enough to be featured. Plus it hurts my eye.Trongphu (talk) 00:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 12:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunrise apollo side.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2012 at 16:46:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trongphu (talk) 23:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question – I would support but first I must ask: does this picture require a retouched picture template? SteveStrummer (talk) 02:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Went back to the orginal and it was 1 full stop underexposed. A levels adjust, dust spot removal, minor colour noise reduction and final sharpening brought this result. Saffron Blaze (talk) 09:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support - SteveStrummer (talk) 21:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- An excellent composition and mood. Surprisingly (for a D700) image quality is on the poor side. Could it be a too agressive denoising process? Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 14:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice illustrative pic. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition. --Myrabella (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Georgez (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 20:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the ambiance. --Citron (talk) 10:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Citron --Moonik (talk) 12:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 12:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Image:Street lamp hunting lodge Moenchbruch - Straßenlaterne Jagdschloss Mönchbruch.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2012 at 21:39:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as nominator. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 23:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the crop at bottom is too tight IMHO --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would support a better bottom crop. PierreSelim (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I didn't crop at the bottom. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - A nice picture, but I think the bottom crop is too tight. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ginkunu kapines 2010 velines 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 07:51:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ZwieRys - uploaded by Hugo.arg - nominated by Matasg -- Matasg 07:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Matasg 07:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too low quality for a FP Cathy Richards (talk) 14:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 17:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bataille Waterloo 1815 reconstitution 2011 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 18:30:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Myrabella -- Myrabella (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Myrabella (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 22:50, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition, beautiful colours. With high encyclopedic value. --Cayambe (talk) 11:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting --Schnobby (talk) 12:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition! --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moonik (talk) 14:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Qu'est-ce que j'avais prédit, hein ? C'est grâce à qui tout ça ? Sauf que je n'arrive pas à identifier avec certitude et ça m'énerve.... Could somebody help for identification of these soldiers ? Saxon Landwehr ? Prussian ? Jäger ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment seems to be elements of a finnish regiment of the swedish army. They did not fight at Waterloo/Mont-Saint-Jean. Any other opinion for identification ?--Jebulon (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 20:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is excellent. --Aktron (talk) 09:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – High quality in every way. SteveStrummer (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avenue (talk) 10:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 12:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support je suis comme Grouchy : j'arrive un peu tard...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 22:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Bonn, Bad Godesberg, Michaelskapelle, 2012-02 CN-01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 17:54:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. The baroque interior (1697–99) of the Saint Michael's Chapel in the Bonn district Bad Godesberg (North Rhine-Westphalia) next to the Godesburg Castle. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support good work --mathias K 11:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support pleased to see a very good WB in an indoor, low-light shot. --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 11:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ CA on the lighter parts --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done thank you, I tried to reduce the CA in a few places. Is it better now? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support There is a sensible difference. Great, how did you do it? --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 22:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:SenatorWetmoreInAutomobile retouched.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2012 at 17:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Harris & Ewing, Inc., retouched by Slick nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good historical value, and nicely constructed with excellent contrast and color balance. Some minute scratches and blobs remain from the original, but they give the image authenticity. SteveStrummer (talk) 18:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Steve. --Paolo Costa (talk) 23:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support -- David C. S. 02:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 20:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice historical one.!Trongphu (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Needs to be restored. See, for example, the faces of the senator and his wife. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 20:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar. Those scratches in their faces are really disturbing in full resolution. Tomer T (talk) 12:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The few minor defects do not detract from this impressive 100 year old photograph. Swtpc6800 (talk) 00:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This FP was delisted and replaced by Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Senator_George_P._Wetmore_of_Rhode_Island_in_a_Krieger_electric_automobile.jpg on the 16th August 2019 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 00:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Regenwald-Nilwaran Varanus ornatus.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 14:12:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 14:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 14:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 16:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 22:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:1861-L'univers-illustre cropped.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 17:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by L'univers-illustre - uploaded by Farina-Archiv and edited by Tomer T, 1Veertje and IIVeaa - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 17:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice work but why the doubling in file size? Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:26, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Certainly a quality picture, but I'm sorry, I must oppose this one (for now) for several reasons. In some sections, the cleanup of dirt, streaks, etc. has only replaced dark smudges with light ones (especially around the signature). There is also a heavy brown discoloration in the third archway from the left, and it snakes a path through the center of the image. Most importantly, however, the paper tone of the foreground does not carry through the rest of the image. On close examination, there is widespread color variance in the blacks – they are warm in some areas, cool in others. This yields faint but perceptible tints of blue, green and pink, all of which will be much more pronounced when the image is printed. SteveStrummer (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brandenburg St-Katharinenkirche 17 (MK).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2012 at 18:53:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Interior of the Katharinenkirche in Brandenburg an der Havel view to the organ. c/u/n by me mathias K 18:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- mathias K 18:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 14:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the architecture.Trongphu (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 14:42, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support As the previous one, impressive architecture (and this one doesn't feel distorded to me). --PierreSelim (talk) 22:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry mathias but there are stitching errors all around and the picture is obviously overexposed. Come on guys! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great image, but due to some minor flaws not really FP-worthy: some overexposed parts, and one or two (but not "all around" IMHO) small stitching errors at the far right. -- MJJR (talk) 21:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Info -- Three notes added showing some of them. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar. Tomer T (talk) 12:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombian Air Force Sikorsky AH-60L Arpia III (S-70A-41) Ramirez-1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2012 at 02:06:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Andrés Ramírez - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- another photo from this sequence is available at File:Colombian Air Force Sikorsky AH-60L Arpia III (S-70A-41) Ramirez.jpg, but due to cropping on that image being tighter, the first image from this sequence is being nommed. russavia (talk) 02:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:02, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 14:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support GreyHood ^Talk 19:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive --Ximonic (talk) 22:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would call this EPIC!Trongphu (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question -- Could you please explain what's happening? Missil firing? Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think they are flares. --Ximonic (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support They are not missiles since they're not all heading in the same direction. They are flares, probably on a demonstration or test. Weak support because the position of the beaters is really infortunate, covering the cabin! What a pity. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The position of the rotorblades is unfortunate. -- Achird (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support great picture--David საქართველო 09:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Industry park Höchst - waste-to-energy plant - Industriepark Höchst - Müllverbrennungsanlage - 07.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2012 at 20:46:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Norbert Nagel -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as nominator. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it looks for me underexposed and oversaturated. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The picture looks quite dark but I guess it is not irreparable. The picture could be brightened a little (perhaps by adjusting exposure in Photoshop or Camera Raw or similar). However, overexposure on the chimneys should be avoided meanwhile so they could be masked out or something. --Ximonic (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The thumbnail looks dark but in full resolution it is OK, I think. The sky is darker than a regular blue sky, because it was heavily clouded that day. The picture was taken just after sunrise when the sun was still below the clouds in the back (left hand side) of the photographer and illuminated the foreground and the plant, which both are not dark if you look at the image in full resolution. Concerning colour saturation: It's a tone-mapped HDR of a colourful plant. There is slight emphasis on the colours, but not far away from natural. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Junonia almana by kadavoor.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2012 at 09:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor - nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 14:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moonik (talk) 14:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose distracting background, sharpness could be better and the shadow on the wing also isn`t nice. --mathias K 16:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support a bit of distracting background but still great!Trongphu (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - BBB (below bug bar). Almost there but focus is missing where it is more needed: the body, head and antennae. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snowy fountain of neptune - Bologna.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2012 at 16:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Andou - uploaded by Andou - nominated by Andou -- Andou (talk) 16:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andou (talk) 16:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The crop doesn't seams to be good. Isn't the bottom part of the fountain missing?--186.221.135.78 17:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you're right, but my intention was to depict the statue of Neptune and not the whole fountain (instead of the title,though...)--Andou (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wanted to support, but it seems like there are some CAs. Tomer T (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bottom crop too tight, and CA on the bottom snow line. --ELEKHH^T 19:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much flaw.Trongphu (talk) 00:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMPO, too much snow. --Yikrazuul (talk) 12:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination :) --Andou (talk) 16:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:52, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atelopus limosus female 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2012 at 10:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Brian Gratwicke - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 10:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 10:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support cute :-D PierreSelim (talk) 14:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 14:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice frog!Trongphu (talk) 23:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nice and detailed image of an endangered species with very limited habitat range. The male is interesting as well. --ELEKHH^T 08:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry guys but the image quality is not there: flat lighting, unsharpness and lack of detail (Exif is missing). A very good candidate to VI though. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It can't be VI because of lack of geocoding. Tomer T (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose same as here. Harsh lighting, strong shadow and overall not the quality. Sorry... --mathias K 19:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves + Mathias. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a good quality picture... but the the lighting is not good enough for FP, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 17:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Cayambe. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians

File:Gatchina. Pavilion Venery 2010.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2012 at 06:18:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Art-top - uploaded by Art-top - nominated by Art-top -- Art-top (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Art-top (talk) 06:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Boring composition and quality could be better. --Citron (talk) 10:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oxybelis aeneus 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2012 at 14:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Brian Gratwicke - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 14:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 14:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:20, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SupportTrongphu (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Informative and good wow factor. I like the realistic clarity and hue, and the uncommon head/neck composition is... striking. SteveStrummer (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not a fan of "only head" shots, even if I understand that for a snake, it probably is the best way to show the important details. Also the background is very dark. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. The lighting is again pretty harsh, but here i could live with it. But i don`t like the crop. The leafs on the upper left side are distracting and the plant in the right background could also cropped out a little bit... --mathias K 20:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:46, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:ST vs SUA - 2012-02-18 - Warm up - 12 - Line out training.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2012 at 14:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by me -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 14:22, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 09:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the framing (inter alia tight and feet cut off at bottom), background is disturbing --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LC-de (talk) 22:36, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral i don't see anything special about it or anything that worthy of featured.Trongphu (talk) 23:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Too tight crop spoiling the feeling of motion/action. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose As Alves, I feel the crop is very tight. Otherwise excellent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolostefano1412 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 26 February 2012 UTC (UTC)
Oppose Too tight crop and distracting background. --ELEKHH^T 08:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support good quality, and illustrate the subject very well.--ArildV (talk) 14:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose pretty nice quality but the thight crop spoil this picture, sorry. --mathias K 20:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop is too tight. -- Achird (talk) 21:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 12:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stenella frontalis DSC 0236.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2012 at 09:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Martina Nolte - nominated by Peter Weis
Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 09:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Very interesting and almost abstract take but it has some strong chromatic aberrations next to the bright areas. --Ximonic (talk) 13:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I uploaded a new version, removed ca. --Martina talk 14:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's better. --Ximonic (talk) 20:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support A poetic picture. --Citron (talk) 10:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual picture of a dolphin --Llez (talk) 11:23, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

♂ Calopteryx splendens, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2012 at 11:34:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info ♂ Banded Demoiselle c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very nice. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Very good, nothing to say. Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 20:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 22:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see a live one get featured. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent detail --NJR_ZA (talk) 09:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 10:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 09:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Karnevalsumzug Meckenheim 2012-02-19-5526.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2012 at 21:05:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Slick - uploaded by Slick - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It seems to me that the focus is on the wrong place, also the DOF is not enough and CA's are visible as well. - A.Savin 18:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support sorry, i see no reason why this picture should be a feature picture.Trongphu (talk) 23:46, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Trongphu, but oppose. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Yikrazuul. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp Cathy Richards (talk) 22:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 12:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012-01-10 22-27-35-fort-salbert.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2012 at 08:15:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 08:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 08:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 12:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This picture is already featured. It's nearly the same view, just with some snow. I think this previous one is much better. --LC-de (talk) 20:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per LC-de --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support i agree that it's almost the same but not exactly. I can say there is a big enough different between the two. Each has their own beauty.Trongphu (talk) 23:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- One is enough. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per LC-de. --ELEKHH^T 08:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BGEN Olds, Robin.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 04:46:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by United States Air Force - uploaded by Connormah - nominated by Connormah -- Connormah (talk | contribs) 04:46, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - high resolution, relatively good quality (for the time period it was created) portrait of a notable figure in American military history -- Connormah (talk | contribs) 04:46, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lacks sharpness. Also, looks rather artificial to me (would be probably a good portrait for his gravestone). - A.Savin 11:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it's pretty good quality for the time period it was created in, but of course you are entitled to your opinion. Connormah (talk | contribs) 23:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polson's Coffee & Butter.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2012 at 21:10:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Phil Beard - uploaded by Noopur28 - nominated by Noopur28 -- Noopur28 (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Noopur28 (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it's resolution is less than 2MP and the overall quality of the jpg is poor.

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 21:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment white balance doesn't seem ok. Tomer T (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anonym Kaiser Ferdinand I.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 15:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Anonymous painting. Uploaded by Gryffindor. Enhanced and nominated by Alexcoldcasefan -- Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 15:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 15:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose valuable historic picture: possible VI and also suitable for en-wiki-FP, but I don't see enough 'wow' and exceptionalism for commons-FP. Tomer T (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chlorurus troschelii.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 14:22:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by G. H. Ford - uploaded & nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 14:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 14:22, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 14:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Óðinn (talk) 18:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Magnapop 2010.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 16:28:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info photo by Pieter Verhaeghe - uploaded by Koavf - retouched by Yjenith - nominated by -- Yjenith (talk) 16:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yjenith (talk) 16:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There's something not right with this picture. Look at the man on the left. His right arm is fine but is left arm looks like it only has four shades of grey. His hair is essentially black and mid-grey and nothing else. I'm wondering if this is an effect or was the original colour picture a failure that was "rescued" by making it black and white and arty? Colin (talk) 19:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the nomination! I'm not sure what the criteria are for featured status on Commons, so I'm certainly not qualified to say if this fits, but I appreciate the consideration either way. Koavf (talk) 15:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Novgorod - View on Yuriev Monastery from Volkhov 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2012 at 23:14:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by A.Savin, pls. let me know if there are fixable issues - 23:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Neutral - A.Savin 23:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paramecium (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think that the crop without the left distracting building will be better --Moonik (talk) 12:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This tower is a part of the monastery wall, I wouldn't cut it away. - A.Savin 13:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --ST ○ 05:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The fisherman swayed me. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Unidentified African American soldier in Union uniform with wife and two daughters.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2012 at 22:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info uploaded by User:Scewing - nominated by User:Scewing -- Scewing (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is the only known photograph of an African American Union soldier with his family. In May 1863, U.S. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton issued General Order No. 143 creating the Bureau of U. S. Colored Troops. This image was found in Cecil County, Maryland, making it likely that this soldier belonged to one of the seven U.S.C.T. regiments raised in Maryland. Samuel Smith, African American soldier in Union uniform with wife and two daughters.jpg Zoom
Support -- Scewing (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Supporti always like to support historical pictures.Trongphu (talk) 23:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. Excellent historical document, including the kistchy framing. But the photo needs to be restored. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I agree with Alvesgaspar as to the hirtorical value and the lovely frame;) but I don't think it needs to be restored. MartinD (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar TucsonDavidU.S.A. 08:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good to me. I don't think there's a need to restore. InverseHypercube 08:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brīvības piemineklis (by Pudelek) - part.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 14:51:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WB seems not ok. Clouds look blue. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Cropping is visually distracting, and the angle at which the photo was taken is a bit too steep. Nice photo, but not FPC in my opinion. Scewing (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Paolo Costa & Scewing. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koala at Otway National Park.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2012 at 13:16:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by cycling - uploaded by cycling - nominated by cycling -- Cycling (talk) 13:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cycling (talk) 13:16, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed, not sharp. Tomer T (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Tomer plus very strong chromatic aberration (violet fringes). --Cayambe (talk) 16:54, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed parts, unfortunate composition. -- MJJR (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 16:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NahuelHuapiyBariloche.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 15:16:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Elemaki -- elemaki (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- elemaki (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hermoso lugar, tuve el privilegio de visitar Bariloche y ver el Nahuel Huapi unos años atrás. Un espectáculo. Lamentablemente las condiciones atmosféricas cuando tomaste la foto no eran muy buenas para fotografiar, con escasa luz en ciertas zonas y algunas partes muy brilantes en las nubes. Tampoco se aprecia el verde de las montañas por la poca luz: la imágen se ve muy azul. De lo contrario muy buena imágen de valor enciclopédico. --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- A very beautiful place and a nice picture. Unfortunatly the lighting is less than optimal and the composition a bit too symmetrical and boring. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petra Jordan BW 37.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2012 at 14:54:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info - uploaded - nominated -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment has the color of the sky been adjusted? It seems a bit dark. Scewing (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ I don't think so. It happens a lot with desertic environment or light-reflecting stone, with very harsh illumination. To avoid over-exposure shutter speed is set to a fast value, usually resulting in dark skies, like in this case. --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support removed per Carschten. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:00, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The sky is that dark becasue it is being naturally polarised by the position of the sun behind the photographer. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, sorry, the already featured version is better. --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (strong) oversaturation, CA, perspective of the already featured image looks better --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry but per above. The already featured version is better. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:31, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silhouette Volleyball.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2012 at 05:12:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Darafsh Kaviyani - uploaded by Darafsh Kaviyani - nominated by Darafsh Kaviyani -- Mamad ^TALK 05:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mamad ^TALK 05:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 14:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As for the insects, the FP bar for sunsets and related subjects is quite high. This is a cute picture but not special enough, imo, to deserve the star. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree on Alvesgaspar. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:46, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alvesgaspar --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Alinasab 22:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Account too young. Please don't canvass! Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Alvesgaspar. Yann (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but per Alvesgaspar. --Kadellar (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--P0lyzoarium (talk) 19:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manhattan from Weehawken, NJ.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2012 at 10:34:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dmitry Avdeev - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dima will be perusing this nomination, so will see any critiques and fix if needed. russavia (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geocode would be appreciated... --Jovian Eye _storm 12:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment permission is not yet approved --Martina talk 12:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- permission is all ok. I have made it pending as previous permission was only for gfdl 1.2 --- now it includes cc-by-sa-.30. russavia (talk) 13:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah okay, thanks. --Martina talk 20:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Wonderful! Very good, with a big wow, good exposure (only a bit overexposed on Emp St Bld) and focus. It still needs vertical distortion and tilt correction though. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martina talk 20:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful Manhattan--David საქართველო 09:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 13:01, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 18:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – SteveStrummer (talk) 07:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 09:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:34, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 17:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Tramonto 21-01-12 Genova.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 23:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by SteGrifo27 -- SteGrifo27 (tell me) 23:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SteGrifo27 (tell me) 23:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just Another Sunset. Colin (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated, even the exif data say so. --Kadellar (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 16:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 06:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Just a sunset, no intrinsic value and not high technical quality --NJR_ZA (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 15:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Škoda 15T, smyčka Radlická.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2012 at 16:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jagro- uploaded by Jagro - nominated by Kyah117 -- Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 16:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 16:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unbalanced composition and imo not the best point of view. --mathias K 19:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mě se to náhodou líbí a ten modrej šum na obloze bych zas tak neřešil. --Aktron (talk) 09:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support good and wunderfull picture. alofok * 15:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't like the man who is driving. --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 12:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- BTW, it's not driver but technician (employee of technical control division); the driver is somewhere talking with passengers. :) — Jagro (talk) 17:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:View of the rade of Brest.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2012 at 14:55:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 14:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Either the coast or the branches. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The branches are too distracting. If they formed a frame around the scene it would be better. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose pour les raisons évoquées ci-dessus. Pas de réel sujet ou de point d'accorche de l'oeil. --BastienM (talk) 09:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Llorenzi (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Evviva l'anguria!.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2012 at 09:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Spinoziano - uploaded by Spinoziano - nominated by Spinoziano -- Spinoziano (talk) 09:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spinoziano (talk) 09:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Very nice watermellon. Saffron Blaze (talk) 09:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Poor quality, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Laguna Verde - San Isidro Km 88.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2012 at 22:19:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Paolo Costa (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zapyon (talk) 12:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --David საქართველო 09:47, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful picture. But, for the presentation of the green lagoon, too much reflection. I would like to see more green water, as the sky again. Polarizing filter? Sorry. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mont St-Michel (July 2011).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2012 at 15:24:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by Lystopad -- Lystopad (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lystopad (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- May I suggest you take another look, this time with the picture in full size? This kind of automatic supports is not useful for the forum or the nominations. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Far too unsharp, just zoom in and find out. --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Per above, very poor quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose colours. quality. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --mathias K 19:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above and most perplexed that the photographer has waited until the main feature, St Michel, is in shadow while the rest of the picture is fully sunlit. Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sergey Lapushkin Stoneham 2012.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2012 at 10:37:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 10:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 10:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:48, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but separation of subject from background is not good and the background houses are distracting my attention. --Jovian Eye _storm 13:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not distracted by the background. I think that's what making it special. Tomer T (talk) 07:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tomer T. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 18:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:US Postal Currency 5 cent 1862 1863.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2012 at 05:52:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A high resolution scan of a Civil War era 5 cent note created, uploaded and nominated by Swtpc6800 -- Swtpc6800 (talk) 05:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Swtpc6800 (talk) 05:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a first issue Postal Currency note and is in excellent shape for being 150 years old. Scans of this resolution are near impossible to find. This was scanned at 720 dpi. People horded all of the gold and silver coins during the Civil War so the Post Office was authorized to issue small denomination paper currency to facilitate everyday transactions. Unfortunately that is just Thomas Jefferson on the front, an eagle or other bird would increase support for this as a featured picture candidate.-- Swtpc6800 (talk) 00:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support At full size quality is pretty good, can't see any technical problems, the stamp is actually very well preserved, being true that it is 150 years old. This has good EV. and quality. More votes will come don't worry about the eagle, give people some time to review the file, good luck. --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:33, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 19:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support InverseHypercube 08:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have uploaded the tiff files for the front and back of the note. File:US_Postal_Currency_5_cent_1862_front_720a.tif and File:US_Postal_Currency_5_cent_1862_back_720a.tif I also uploaded tiff files made with different scanner settings, the mid-tones were darkened. (Photoshop Elements, Histogram adjustment, mid-tone from 1.2 to 1.0.) File:US_Postal_Currency_5_cent_1862_front_720b.tif and File:US_Postal_Currency_5_cent_1862_back_720b.tif -- Swtpc6800 (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Barack Obama & Joe Biden with Mikhail Gorbachev 3-20.09.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 18:51:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pete Souza - uploaded by Túrelio - nominated by TrebleSeven -- TrebleSeven (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator -- TrebleSeven (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed windows, badly cropped from the sides, strange blue color on Biden's left arm. Tomer T (talk) 19:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop, strange blue color on Biden's left arm. Yann (talk) 04:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Yann. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--P0lyzoarium (talk) 19:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- TrebleSeven (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MC KleinerPanda.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2012 at 19:10:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Chmehl - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Variante

Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Óðinn (talk) 18:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool! Calandrella (talk) 23:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute --Schnobby (talk) 09:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support odder (talk) 14:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, fantastic.Sasha Krotov (talk) 16:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice--David საქართველო 09:45, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I oppose this type of editing, where an object is removed the remaining space clone stamped (correct me if I'm wrong). I would support the non-edited version though. InverseHypercube 08:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 14:01, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Manipulation of a large area. Subject is not impossible to re-shoot, and we have plenty of good unmanipulated mammals. --99of9 (talk) 06:20, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Manipulation in foreground.(Most background manipulations are unacceptable) Please read the formal things section--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 10:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute, sharp, nice colors. Yann (talk) 14:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 10:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

The chosen alternative is: File:MC Kleiner Panda.jpg

File:Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild BW 2011-06-10 11-42-29.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 13:08:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 13:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I loved this the first time I saw it on QI. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info tilt --Böhringer (talk) 22:38, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Variante

Info 0,7° nach links gedreht + 2 minimale Lichtkorrekturen
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:38, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ditto -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors like an ice cream parlour - nice! --Schnobby (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 06:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not 100% convinced about the crop (framing) but very nice view. --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Tomer T (talk) 18:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HomelessParis 7032101.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 12:23:00

Info Too small, less than 2MPX. (Original nomination)
Delist -- TrebleSeven (talk) 12:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is less than 2MPX, but I think it should be an exception, as it has an important role in FP history (second place in 2006 POTY). Tomer T (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as Tomer. Yann (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Jovian Eye _storm 02:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. A most worthy exception to the rules. Quite a prize for Commons, really. SteveStrummer (talk) 07:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Katarighe (Talk) 00:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Desert varnish - Valley of Fire State Park.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 03:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Óðinn (talk) 03:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator. I believe this illustrates the subject very well. -- Óðinn (talk) 03:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe the crop on the top is not the best? --Llorenzi (talk) 12:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the crop is simply too tight for me. Otherwise nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flowing artesian well.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2012 at 00:12:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 13:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 17:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:29, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

File:Hadji Ali demonstrating controlled regurgitation Crisco edit.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 15:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Created by National Photo Company Collection, restored by Cenpacrr and Crisco 1492 - nominated by [[Crisco 1492]] -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support InverseHypercube 08:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lanco (LAN Cargo) Boeing 767-300ER Ramirez (uncropped).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 10:02:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Andrés Ramírez - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 10:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This photo was originally uploaded at airliners.net, an aviation photography website which has tight cropping requirements for its uploads. The original image was uploaded to Commons at File:Lanco (LAN Cargo) Boeing 767-300ER Ramirez.jpg. Andrés has provided the uncropped version of this photo and it is the image being nominated. If the crop of this photo is too tight, Andrés has said he will search for other photos from this sequence; but by my own aesthetics, this photo shows the size of the 767, and one landing, perfectly. russavia (talk) 10:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 10:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition and the light. The quality is very nice too. bushman787 (talk) 10:27, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry but the plane looks caged. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose harsh sunlight is not useful for white airplanes: bad light with blown white parts, crop too tight on the left and right IMO --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree with the above. The crop is too tight. --NJR_ZA (talk) 09:20, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 12:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lighthouse of Porzic.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2012 at 14:58:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 14:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose cadrage pas très intéressant, contraste et piqué à revoir. --BastienM (talk) 09:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lycoperdon-perlatum-flaschenstaeubling-alt.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 14:09:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 14:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice name and picture --Schnobby (talk) 16:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nitid at full size. --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:21, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:11, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support great and very informative picture --BastienM (talk) 09:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 07:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 18:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 02:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Tintern Abbey and Courtyard.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 15:18:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems tilted ccw at the right a bit. - A.Savin 18:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how to address that if it is indeed the case. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cephas (talk) 23:24, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 09:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paolo Costa (talk) 20:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:38, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Tiny Grass Blue Zizula hylax by kadavoor.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 06:44:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor - nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support This small butterfly (wing span of the adults is about 1.5 centimetres (0.59 in)) will swing like a boat in the waves while perched; so I have to frighten her slightly to cease the motion. :) -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice butterfly, nice background --Schnobby (talk) 07:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Quality ok for me. Nice BG too, but some sharpening would be necessary. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Request How can I increase the sharpness? -- Jkadavoor (talk) 16:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - There are many ways, from better focusing, increasing built-in sharpness of the camera settings, and photo editing. I am of course talking about photo editing in this case, using software (for sharpening I strongly recommend Photoshop Lightroom). --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done; thanks.
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's alive! -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Water drop 001.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 13:59:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by "José Manuel Suárez"(Flickr) - uploaded by Zaqarbal - nominated by Gauravjuvekar -- Gauravjuvekar (talk) 13:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gauravjuvekar (talk) 13:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 09:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 01:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 09:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim 17:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

File:125 - Québec - Pont de Québec de nuit - Septembre 2009.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 11:30:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by S23678 - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 11:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose distortions, poor quality (noisy sky, lots of blurry areas, low sharpness, posterization, sharpening halos, ...), bad framing. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(I know that was fast, but) you've got a point. I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Prismatic Spring and Midway Geyser Basin from above.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2009 at 07:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Mila Zinkova - uploaded by Mbz1 - nominated by Tiptoety -- Tiptoety ^talk 07:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tiptoety ^talk 07:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - WOW! Strong support! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this one which looks very similar is already featured. /Daniel78 (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Daniel's right, the nomination is here. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - duplicate of an already featured image.--Avala (talk) 12:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Avala. —kallerna™ 16:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: The nomination is useless as the same image, with a different name, is already a FP -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Oppose per Avala. --Korman (talk) 00:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giant Kingfisher-002.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2012 at 20:58:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Leo_za1 - uploaded by Leo_za1 - nominated by NJR_ZA -- NJR_ZA (talk) 20:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- NJR_ZA (talk) 20:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support While it's a shame that the background behind the kingfisher's dark head also is dark, the picture is still really amazing. Very well done, Leo za1! :-) Calandrella (talk) 22:49, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --Karelj (talk) 23:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see a higher res version was uploaded but there seems to be no corresponding increase in detail. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:23, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot --Schnobby (talk) 09:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Personally I dont like the background. It has a ugly color. --Llorenzi (talk) 16:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow factor to me. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose wow factor indeed, but not very sharp. Tomer T (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:36, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Observation Tower view of Niagara Falls in winter - Cropped version.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2012 at 04:10:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Paolo Costa (talk) 04:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Changes since last nom: vertical distortion was reduced, picture has been cropped, levels were adjusted, quality was enhanced, and clarity and contrast increased on the falls mist to show more detail.
Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 04:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 05:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but still I do not like the view represented in that picture.. --Llorenzi (talk) 08:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 09:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work. I like this unusual view. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 07:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lontra canadensis NewOrleans (crop).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 09:40:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Brian Gratwicke - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 09:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 09:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cute, but all blurred. Overexposed background is distracting. Yann (talk) 14:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. Tomer T (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 00:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--P0lyzoarium (talk) 19:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination —Bruce1ee^talk 05:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bartolomejske namesti.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2012 at 22:58:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Radek Linner - uploaded by Radek Linner - nominated by Radek Linner -- Radek Linner (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radek Linner (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good picture, nice colors and composition. Camera quality not that good though imo. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Lovely angle, very nice color and contrast, and good job capturing the plaza without any traffic. SteveStrummer (talk) 22:27, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SupportSome (acceptable) chromatic aberration left and right, but very good and very illustrative.--Jebulon (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of the CAs on the fence Tomer T (talk) 14:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Tomer T and Paolo Costa. --Kadellar (talk) 16:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sheepscombe St Johns Church.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 20:35:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stu Phillips (talk) 03:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 05:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 06:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 12:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Really like the composition --NJR_ZA (talk) 12:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant view --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:14, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 16:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful Scewing (talk) 20:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding shot --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Palais Saint-Georges, Rennes, Aug 2010.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 20:25:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Julia W - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 20:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Generally a great picture, but. Stitching error in left area. This motif don't need any pixel "monster". 75% of the resolution, would be enough to consider for many details. And I could view it without downloading. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Small stitching error on the left roof, but otherwise nice. -- -donald- (talk) 13:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ... poor colours, crop, stitching, focus, quality ... (per annotations) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ritchyblack. -- Achird (talk) 11:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see the stitching error. I agree it prevents the image from being FP. Tomer T (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glacier mouth.jpg, delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2012 at 14:58:33

Info Unsharp, overexposed, CAs, composition isn't 'wow' and in addition less than 2MPX (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 14:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per application, nothing to add. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 15:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --Cayambe (talk) 16:23, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 16:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --Kadellar (talk) 16:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom --Citron (talk) 18:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I don't see much featurable stuff. I do see technical issues and a not so interesting composition. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist it is a nice picture though Cathy Richards (talk) 21:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 9 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /Gauravjuvekar (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catholicon, Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2012 at 20:42:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Poco a poco -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ very nice and the the light rays make it WOW to me, but the image has some noise (due to ISO 400)... Difficult decision --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 22:44, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I uploaded a new version with the target to fix that noise, thanks and regards, --Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support--David საქართველო 09:38, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 03:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, tending to oppose. Not bad, very sharp and nice, emotional and educational value. But this kind of picture needs more geometry IMO, and the "circles" are not centered. + crop not perfect: I miss an edge.--Jebulon (talk) 11:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:10, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Venusschuh paphiopedilum tranlienianum.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2012 at 11:10:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 11:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 11:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose seems underexposed + some strange effect on the background (see here). Tomer T (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 18:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Citron (talk) 01:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fayette Station Bridge.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2012 at 16:05:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by JaGa - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Great colors, quality ok. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed my vote because there's a completely blurred area on the right side. Looks like a drop fell on the lens or as if there was a bad stitch job or something... therefore it is not anymore among our best work imo. --Paolo Costa (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great Autumn colors :)--David საქართველო 09:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kevin .B ^{[Let's talk about it!]} 09:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support spectacular. Kooritza (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Gut Marienhof Haupthaus DRI edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2012 at 10:57:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, edited and nominated by PETER WEIS TALK 10:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. -- -donald- (talk) 11:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, very nice indeed. Maybe a bit dark in some areas. --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow --PierreSelim (talk) 10:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perspective distorsions should be corrected both sides of the the house, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 14:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:59, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 06:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:John F Kennedy Official Portrait.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ended on 11 Mar 2012 at 15:42:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Aaron Shikler - uploaded by Scewing - nominated by TrebleSeven -- TrebleSeven (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator -- TrebleSeven (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Great portrait, important person, nice art, good quality. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 09:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:06, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question – The file source is credited as The White House Historical Association. Was this high-res file provided by them? SteveStrummer (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. If you look at the file, Scewing provides his source in the file history, which is http://www.whitehouseresearch.org/assetbank-whha/action/viewAsset?id=124&index=4&total=7&view=viewSearchItem. No worries now. TrebleSeven (talk) 18:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that is quite a worry. According to the Association's Rights & Reproductions Guidelines, their images are sold with all rights reserved. It would seem that this version should not even be on Commons at all. Perhaps an administrator can confirm this? SteveStrummer (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that, unfortunately, this image appears to be copyrighted by the WHHA. In order to ensure a proper discussion regarding the image's copyright status, I've opened an RfD at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:John_F_Kennedy_Official_Portrait.jpg. Further voting should probably be suspended until the RfD has been closed. —Eustress ^talk 01:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Pylon in Plouzané.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2012 at 08:27:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 08:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author. --Llorenzi (talk) 15:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The main subject is too centralized and blurry. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I can understand the blurry, but not the "centralized of the main subject"....--Llorenzi (talk) 08:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As author you are allowed to photograph the pylon as you want. But to me it precipitated not so. --Ritchyblack (talk) 09:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nothing special. Yann (talk) 17:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A pleasant scene and OK quality, but missing the main FP goal, value. The pylons and line crossing is to small to be the theme of the photo. --NJR_ZA (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Llorenzi (talk) 09:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:AbrahamLincolnOilPainting1869Restored.jpg, not featured

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Please do not add any new votes. I have seen SteveStrummer's very good point and have therefore withdrew it. This nomination has been withdrawn. --TrebleSeven (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Posthumous official presidential portrait of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln, painted by Healy George P. A. Healy

Info created by Healy George P. A. Healy - uploaded by Nehrams2020 - nominated by TrebleSeven -- TrebleSeven (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator -- TrebleSeven (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak support~~ Can't see any detail on the dark areas --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Now that the original painting was shown, my suspicion about the lack of detail was confirmed and enhanced. --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Pleasing to the modern eye, but not an accurate representation of the original art. Healy was a classically-trained draftsman who painted in traditional academic style. In this version the shadow areas are filled to maximum density, obscuring all shape and detail in the clothes and losing the separation between figure and background – certainly not Healy's style. SteveStrummer (talk) 21:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per SteveStrummer. Yann (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info This is the original painting with no retouches or improvements.
Support as nominator -- TrebleSeven (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – That's the original file, not the original painting. Other files like this, while perhaps not perfect, at least show what's missing. SteveStrummer (talk) 18:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per SteveStrummer. Yann (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- TrebleSeven (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubble Views Grand Star-Forming Region.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2012 at 09:08:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by Dipankan001 - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good photo, sharp, high educational value. -- Dipankan001 (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, The resolution is to small. 2MP are needed. - Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have removed the above comment because high res version has been uploaded. Dipankan001 (talk) 06:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Uploaded higher resolution version. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Much much better --Paolo Costa (talk) 23:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Already featured! --Paolo Costa (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Don't you think this picture look like this picture?.Tnt1984 (talk) 07:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
still Oppose and still FPXed. We have already a FP of this object in a higher resolution. Thanks to Tnt1984 for the info. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Already featured in better resolution. -- Achird (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alchemist. Tomer T (talk) 12:42, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 15:51, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 18:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Already featured!! --Kadellar (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panthera tigris virgata.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 12:51:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Unknown - uploaded by FunkMonk - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 12:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 12:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: reason - Important & historic image, but does not meet image resolution requirements for FPC Scewing (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Sandboarding in Dubai.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 16:08:42

Info Very low resolution, way below current standards (Original nomination)
Delist -- MPF (talk) 16:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep resolution is higher than 2MPX (3,150,000 pixels), so it does follow current standards. Pic itself is impressive and of good quality. Tomer T (talk) 17:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it is only 342 KB, compared to 2-3 or more MB for most other featured pics. Spread over 3MPX, that makes for poor image quality with obvious compression artefacts - MPF (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as Tomer. Yann (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per MPF. --Cayambe (talk) 10:29, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I wouldn't go delisting most of our FPs just based on technology issues. No need to see that much detail in this pic in my opinion. Some pics are very good despite not having huge quality. This is one of those imo, I'd keep it. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Tomer and Paolo. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's one of our very few good exemple of sport pictures, and it is indeed impressive (WOW). I also agree with Tomer T and Paolo Costa. --PierreSelim (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Cathy Richards (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 00:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paolo --Dr.Haus (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist A little bit too unsharp, but still good picture. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 delist, 6 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Streifenhoernchen.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 17:22:22

Info Unsharp, color issues (don't know the technical term) around the squirrel's fur, crop of the tail isn't good, resolution less than 2MPX (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 17:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Citron (talk) 18:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Blown areas. --Cayambe (talk) 19:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't think the technical issues are significant. Excellent picture in my opinion. InverseHypercube 08:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist No longer meets our standards. Most of the animal is outside the narrow field of focus (feet, tail, legs). --99of9 (talk) 06:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 00:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricketer bowled.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 15:46:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lemonlolly - uploaded by Lemonlolly - nominated by Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 15:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Harrias (talk) 15:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What is that thing flying in the left? Tomer T (talk) 16:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One of the bails from the top of the stumps: the other is also in the shot, just in front of the left-hand (as we look at it) stump. Harrias (talk) 16:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:11, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 03:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The artificial green pitch in the background spoils the composition somewhat (and makes the context seem a bit amateur... no offence to the player-photographer ;-) --99of9 (talk) 06:16, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No offence is taken, I'm sure. For clarification, it's a mat protecting another wicket. Harrias (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flickr - Ministério da Cultura - Acre, AC (35).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 10:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Acre, AC / Ministério da Cultura - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 10:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Source: Flickr, COM:PEOPLE - donna know. --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: On that page (just scroll down) is something about "price". Can someone verify whether this picture is really CC-BY 2.0? --Yikrazuul (talk) 10:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Info That’s the price of a touristic package; the photo is not the tour agency’s to sell. -- Tuválkin ✉ 13:34, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support but only if COM:PEOPLE is cleared.
Support is cleared --Böhringer (talk) 22:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 13:26, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Can't resist. Very nice girl and high quality portrait. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request This file is not used in Wikimedia projects. I hope it will be changed. Przykuta → [edit] 15:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:58, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I might have missed something, but this image is on turismo website, which does not seem to me to be associated with cultura.gov.br, the flickr user listed as the source on Commons. Was it accidentally uploaded to flickr with the wrong licence? Another complication is that turismo appears to be giving the credit to Pedro França/Minc/Flickr, and it seems to me that no one with this name on flickr is currently showing this image. The girl was photographed with a Nikon D 700, a different camera to the rest of the flickr user's photographs, a sign of copyright laundering. If this does not have a creative commons licence, then this image should be deleted from Commons. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think Minc might stand for the culture ministry in the Brazilian government. Are photographs published by the Brazilian government distributed with a licence suitable for Commons? Snowmanradio (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm also concerned about featuring this with so many potential copyright problems. I don't have enough evidence to nominate it for deletion, but it feels very uncomfortable to me, so I must oppose. --99of9 (talk) 06:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support All nice--Miguel Bugallo 11:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info To the people that have doubts about the copyright of this photo, if they took 3 minutes and spoke portuguese (the language of Brazil), you would noticed that the "Turismo" website(turism in english) is not associated with the brazilian Ministry of Culture but is part of IG website, as that same site states that the photo is taken by Pedro França/Minc/Flickr where Pedro França is the author, as worker (tanking several photos using in several of them a Nikon D700 as seen This image for MINC (that stands for the portuguese "Ministério da Cultura") and also on the Brazilian Ministry of Culture there is a link to the its official flickrsytream from where this image is sourced. Tm (talk) 02:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Ice age fauna of northern Spain - Mauricio Antón.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 23:59:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Mauricio Antón - uploaded by Bender235 - nominated by Daniel Mietchen -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:08, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just so good, the brightness on the subjects. Kiko4564 (talk) 19:32, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose White balance seems off for a realistic representation (blue snow), and for scans of paintings we would usually expect a higher resolution, better sharpness, and more detail. --99of9 (talk) 06:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per 99of9. Yann (talk) 14:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per 99of9. InverseHypercube 18:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice view and image. But the white balance is off (blue snow and blue tusks). --Cayambe (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per 99of9. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 11:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
White balance adjusted. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 13:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The change in the white balance made a huge difference. Compare before and after. I definitely support this picture after the change. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support the problem seems to be fixed --DarTar (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. Reconstruction, not consensual. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What does that mean? Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Archaeo. I have doubts.--Jebulon (talk) 10:46, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Raphman (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelourinhorebordainhos.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2012 at 15:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by AlvesRF - uploaded by AlvesRF - nominated by AlvesRF -- AlvesRF (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AlvesRF (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Honestly I don't see any featurable in this cloudy image. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 16:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yikrazuul--David საქართველო 08:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rain is flooded by sunlight in the Grand Canyon.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 00:23:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, bad quality image and over exposed. Dipankan001 (talk) 06:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think this must have looked impressive in real life but as a photo it is more of an abstract than a landscape and hard to tell depth or scale. It looks not too bad on this page but disappointing at full screen never mind full size -- there's just no extra detail to reward clicking. As pictures of sunsets or of the Grand Canyon go, this doesn't reach FP IMO. Colin (talk) 11:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 17:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jawa 21 on motocross race Václavická hodinovka 2011.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2012 at 11:25:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tlusťa - uploaded by Tlusťa - nominated by Tlusťa -- Tlusťa (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tlusťa (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this photo. The aspect ratio is not so well. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good shot! Agree with not best aspect ratio however it is not against FP status for me. --Chmee2 (talk) 13:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Insufficient use of the camera's native resolution. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 17:35, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nicely captured, but sorry, the ribbons spoil the image. --Cayambe (talk) 19:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cahill Expressway from Art Gallery Road.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2012 at 08:19:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by User:InverseHypercube - uploaded by User:InverseHypercube - nominated by User:InverseHypercube -- InverseHypercube 08:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- InverseHypercube 08:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed clouds. Yann (talk) 14:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request do you have a RAW file of this image? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. I tried fixing the overexposed clouds from the RAW, but I couldn't get a good result. You can download it here, if you want to take a look. InverseHypercube 17:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing the RAW file, I made a new try and uploaded it here: File:Cahill Expressway from Art Gallery Road – CN.jpg. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:50, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that looks a lot better, thank you! How did you fix it? I see you used GIMP; did you do any clone stamping? InverseHypercube 00:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info What about this version? InverseHypercube 21:00, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even worse (overexposed). --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative 2

Info Retouched by User:Carschten. InverseHypercube 02:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1967 Mantra-Rock Dance Avalon poster.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2012 at 13:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info uploaded by Cinosaur - nominated by Cinosaur -- Cinosaur (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the only existing artifact for a landmark event of the hippie era, the Mantra-Rock Dance, held in 1967 in San Francisco. The image falls under Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents, and qualifies for FP on all four eligibility counts (even though any one of them should suffice) as:

notable in its own right,, being the only remaining relic of the historic event;
of (arguably) high artistic merit, being a graphic sample of psychedelic art of the time a-la Stanley Mouse;
of high historic merit, bearing witness to the involvement of some iconic counterculture figures like Allen Ginsberg and Janis Joplin with Indian spirituality;
of high illustrative merit, obviously.

The image is already a FP and POTD on EnWiki, so why not on Commons? Regards,Cinosaur (talk) 14:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cinosaur (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not very fan on this one. I don't think this poster is special enough to be featured. Yann (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added a rationale above making a case for the poster's notability. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 02:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Gaura (talk) 09:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo --Katarighe (Talk) 15:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo--Wikidas (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support As per Cinosaur. -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 12:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Petrucci - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2012 at 15:00:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I'd love a Dream Theater FP, but John's face here is just too "deformed". Not his best shot, he really doesn't look like John Petrucci in this pic. I think we could find a better Petrucci picture. Also a lot of noise. --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for the same reason than Paolostefano... --BastienM (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 15:52, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The reasons for your opposition would be well appreciated (here and in every image). --Kadellar (talk) 16:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riga - city gate by night.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2012 at 13:58:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support really nice. Tomer T (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with the above Kiko4564 (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:05, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't like the yellow cast, and something special is missing for me. Yann (talk) 03:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image looks remarkably amateurish to me as impermissibly color-unbalanced, lacking focus on the main feature (the gate), and having its peripheral details washed out (lamps, pavement, walls). Since it's an existing object, why not retake the shot in the daylight? Cinosaur (talk) 06:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- color balance is natural with this lamps. Why not in the daylight? because at night is there a nicer --Pudelek (talk) 09:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cinosaur InverseHypercube 08:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice picture, but nothing special. --BastienM (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 00:18, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dopiero w świetle dziennym zdjęcie było by zwykłą fotką. Teraz ma urok. Albertus teolog (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southern right whale caudal fin-2 no sky.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 21:04:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dr.Haus - uploaded by Dr.Haus - nominated by Dr.Haus -- Dr.Haus (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dr.Haus (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 05:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, very nice, high educational value. Dipankan001 (talk) 09:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not so easy to take a photo like this --Schnobby (talk) 15:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe you crop too much on the left side? --Llorenzi (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support . --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support perfect crop for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly a difficult shot --Paolo Costa (talk) 23:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Colour seems off a tad... greenish? Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Saffron, probably you're having problems with your monitor. There's no such thing noticed by me. Dipankan001 (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish I could see it one day. Good shot! --Egg (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Dipankan001 and Schnobby Cathy Richards (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Soichi 20Noguchi em 20alta.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2012 at 10:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by Felipe Menegaz - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--P0lyzoarium (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Stu Phillips (talk) 02:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 08:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Awesome shot. Tiptoety ^talk 03:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration

File:Otakárek fenyklový, Lovoš, 2009-07-12.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 16:13:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Miraceti - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Egg (talk) 21:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry guys, are you sure? Please have a look in our FP-macro gallery! Imo this is nothing but a simple macro snapshot. The quality isn't the best and the background is very, very disturbing. --mathias K 08:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Perhaps, but it a very good one. Where you see distraction I see a natural setting and it gets bonus points for not be dead on some slab in a studio shot. Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Looking at Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Lepidoptera, I find it better than many of the photos there, some of them look unexciting to me, with simple composition (I can name some examples, if it's necessary). This one stands out for me precisely because of the composition and background. Tomer T (talk) 10:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry guys, this is a nice snapshot but way below the FP bar. Please notice the lack of detail and (apparent) artifacts. Not to say the disturbing background. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Mathias --Böhringer (talk) 11:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above. -- -donald- (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above.--Jebulon (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above. --Miguel Bugallo 21:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad light the background is distracting --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose missing details. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brandenburg St-Katharinenkirche 16 (MK).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 19:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Interior of the Katharinenkirche in Brandenburg an der Havel. Detailed view of the Altar. Here is a picture of the whole Altar. c/u/n by me, mathias K 19:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- mathias K 19:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment das ist aber mehr eine Kanzel als ein Altar... :-) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oben drüber is die Kanzel, darunter der Altar und die Kanzel ist Teil des Altars oder bin ich da falsch?! Gruß mathias K 20:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Die Kanzel befindet sich (eigentlich immer) im Kirchenschiff an der Seite. Das hier sieht mit aus wie eine Figur auf dem Hochaltar, der steht in der Kirche ganz vorne ;-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadow too hard (to many flashlight) and the brightness distribution on the background is suddenly. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gustave Doré - Crucifixion of Jesus.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 21:42:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gustave Doré - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:42, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could you provide information about the digitisation process via Template:Photo Information? Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 12:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done; thanks. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claritas (talk) 19:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jkadavoor (talk) 10:35, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it meets the criteria --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:46, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Poda island beach.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 19:24:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 19:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 19:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! impressive rock! nice image. --Paolo Costa (talk) 20:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great picture, but, the boats cut on the left side disturb me. The picture is not thereby closed. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree on Ritchyblack: For a standing picture the crop is unsuitable. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 17:02, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry but the two left boats should have been someway omitted, or better cropped. Bjoertvedt (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral As above. Maybe better crop (Added image note)? –Makele-90 (talk) 21:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 22:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rose window Richmond.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 19:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by TTaylor - uploaded by TTaylor - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is far below the 2MP resolution limit. --Kadellar (talk) 22:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Backdropped by a Colorful Earth.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 04:58:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by Dipankan001 - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 04:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support High educational value and a beautiful image. -- Dipankan001 (talk) 04:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Same photo already featured. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. --Ximonic (talk) 17:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose double image can be deleted. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is already featured. Nominated picture was a duplicate image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:H-chka-52-5038.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 22:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by PereslavlFoto - nominated by Anonymous

* Support -- 46.120.8.164 22:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC) anonymous votings are not allowed. Please login first. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. Tomer T (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I do not see anything remarkable. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I don't like too many things about this pic: framing, the power lines all along the image, the too pronounced perspective angle, the tight crop on the bottom with unbalanced composition, the avoidable lamp disturbing in front of the building, big CA's (mostly visible on the lower left part), the little sharpness... overall really not a FP to me. And finally, per Yuriy75. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 1) per Paolo Costa (several disturbing elements in the picture), 2) the blue veil somehow does not impress me in this case (there are many other blue hour pictures with a much better mood, compare e.g. to this one, the Irons Museum is better as well), and finally 3) unlike QI, FP candidates shall have a minimal notability - a simple (if not to say: ugly) apartment building fails to provide enough educational value for an "outstanding" picture. Therefore, the general conclusion: QI yes, FP no. - A.Savin 20:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edinburgh Ale by Hill & Adamson c1844.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2012 at 06:37:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Hill & Adamson - uploaded & nominated by User:scewing -- Scewing (talk) 06:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps the first photograph of men drinking beer. 1844 salt print from a paper negative by Hill & Adamson, who produced the first substantial body of self-consciously artistic work using the newly invented medium of photography.
Support -- Scewing (talk) 06:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support A high quality scan of a salt print - that's great. How did you "harvest" the image? Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 23:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:16, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question – From its source credit, this file was apparently harvested from the Metropolitan Museum of Art website. According to the museum's rights statement, its files are *not* public domain. So I must ask: is this file valid for use on Commons? SteveStrummer (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Here you go Steve: Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#The_position_of_the_WMF. So yes. The orginal is obviously in the public domain and the opinion of certain entities on the question of copyright for digital reproductions is remedied by the WMF's statement. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 03:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain – One's own image of this photograph would obviously be OK, but I would have thought that this particular file, virtually unchanged from its unique rendering by MoMA professionals, would be considered an individual and copyrightable object. But if admins consider the WMF statement to be a peg strong enough to hang a Featured Picture upon, then do carry on. SteveStrummer (talk) 16:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Wikimedia Foundation is very firm in their stance that this type of image is in the public domain. See User:Dcoetzee/NPG legal threat Scewing (talk) 16:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Stu Phillips (talk) 02:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahubali Shravana Belagola.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2012 at 21:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Abhishek Jain - uploaded by Abhishek Jain - nominated by Abhishek Jain -- AJ.iitm (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AJ.iitm (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the two people standing in there is quite disturbing the photo. Dipankan001 (talk) 08:28, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Dipankan001. To me, tilted. The empty space on the right is less than on the left. To tight, to me, at top and at bottom--Miguel Bugallo 11:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, also very visible CA (violet and green fringes). --Cayambe (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the image quality isn't OK for FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 18:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhuandaar Water Fall.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2012 at 20:50:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Abhishek Jain - uploaded by Abhishek Jain - nominated by Abhishek Jain -- AJ.iitm (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AJ.iitm (talk) 20:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is most definitely not what i'd expect from a featured picture. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 04:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Maurilbert. The right upper side is underexposed, blurry and noisy. Unsharppened and with chromatic noise to me--Miguel Bugallo 11:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much noisy for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 18:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kolomenskoe Front Gates and Colonel's Palace.jpg, withdrawn

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2012 at 18:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by A. Savin - A.Savin 18:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - A.Savin 18:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose oversatured (please take look to the histogramm) and the disturbing shadow on the left side. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Alchemist-hp --Moonik (talk) 10:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination - A.Savin 12:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lyndon B. Johnson taking the oath of office, November 1963.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 20:44:46

Info Never been voted for, I don't know how it got to be an FP in the first place (anonymous vote does not count). (Original nomination)
Delist as nominator -- TrebleSeven (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 00:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist shouldn't it be "speedy-delisted" or something? Tomer T (talk) 18:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted the user-imposed promotion. TrebleSeven, it was *you* who promoted it! The featured star was not for commons, but was for enwiki and turkish-wiki. --99of9 (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Not exactly. I really did like the image, it's nice and historical, so I felt proud to add another box to emphasize it's status. But then I saw it's nomination page, and I knew something was wrong. Probably after it's been delisted I'd nominate it again, but I can't have a false FP on this wiki. TrebleSeven (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delist , then re-nominate, after TrebleSeven clear explanation. I'll support.--Jebulon (talk) 11:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dynamine postverta postverta MHNT male.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2012 at 11:00:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 11:00, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose compared to other featured pictures of insects, your images lack sharpness. furthermore, the dorsal side is underexposed. your last one was better. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 11:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The two images are not comparable. The dorsal is not underexposed. But I recognize that I have any problem with metallic butterflies. For there not to have one point of overexposure should be very careful about exposure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Stu Phillips (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Amplexus Bufo bufo 2010-03-29.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2012 at 14:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Bernie Kohl - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 14:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 14:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love you! Do you love me too? --Schnobby (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think both crop and composition are good. --Kadellar (talk) 16:27, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 17:18, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 18:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:44, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful, nice colors, good quality. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support love is a many-splendored thing. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wouaouw - Benh (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 01:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 12:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 21:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians

File:Arlington Row Bibury.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2012 at 18:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. Tomer T (talk) 18:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:44, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moonik (talk) 18:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb composition. But I think settings weren't appropriate and that you were saved by the camera. - Benh (talk) 22:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Cathy Richards (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb quality, excellent composition. --Cayambe (talk) 02:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Memorino (talk) 10:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful. Should you add the date the picture was taken to the Information template? Scewing (talk) 15:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support great --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2012 (UTC)-- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition. --Egg (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 10:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support No need now of my support, but...--Jebulon (talk) 15:53, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo 21:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 21:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice indeed. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 00:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I think it could be 2012 POTY :) --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 08:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Fliegenpilz Eifel HDR.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2012 at 18:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Slick - uploaded by Slick - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it's too dark + CAs. Tomer T (talk) 21:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To small depth of field, I can't see the stalk sharp, but the leaf in the foreground is in focus. --Ritchyblack (talk) 06:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose mushroom isn't in center--David საქართველო 08:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose almost the whole picture is unsharp Cathy Richards (talk) 19:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Libellula luctuosa 7.20.2008.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2012 at 01:04:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by MONGO - uploaded by MONGO - nominated by MONGO -- MONGO (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MONGO (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background is not suitable, more blur would be better. Unfortunately. --Ritchyblack (talk) 05:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 16:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support At full resolution, I think the background is adequately blurred. The transparency of the wing tips and the opacity of the white mid-wing spots is well-depicted. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too unsharp and the background is distracting too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Venezuelan Troupial - Icterus icterus.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2012 at 15:59:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Paolo Costa (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 18:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job! --Ximonic (talk) 08:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 12:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo 21:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow --The Photographer (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Totodu74 (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Miss Avatar World Competition girl.png

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2012 at 16:14:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Brianna Beresford - uploaded by Yjenith - nominated by Yjenith -- Yjenith (talk) 16:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yjenith (talk) 16:14, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Image is far below the two million pixels resolution (2MP). -- Dipankan001 (talk) 05:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Nanjing Zifeng Plaza.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 17:08:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jack_No1 - uploaded by Jack_No1 - nominated by Jack_No1 -- Jack No1 (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jack No1 (talk) 17:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Low resolution, unsharp, watermarks. - A.Savin 21:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:CoA of later Ferdinand I Holy Roman Emperor as King of the Romans 1536.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 15:34:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The coat of arms of Ferdinand, King of the Romans, of Hungary and Bohemia, Archduke of Austria, our very glorious prince, 1536. He became Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor in 1558, after the abdication of his elder brother, Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor. In der Burg, wall of the Schweizertrakt, Hofburg palace, Vienna, Austria. -- Jebulon (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tilted and two parts are distracting. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry there is no tilt, only an old relief not perfectly straight. What are the "two parts" ? You think I must clone them out ? But it is reality...--Jebulon (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alchemist. Try to measure from the cornice and you'll notice a slight tilt to the right. I think you can remove the distracting corners on the left and right. You might want to use the {{Retouched picture}} to indicate your changes. That way people will know how your edit differs from reality. Some extra sharpness would be nice as well. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 00:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination OK, thanks both for feedback. Needs obviously some rework. I'll back soon.--Jebulon (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belly dancing girl, Yasmia at Vancouver Sawan Mela, 2011.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 03:55:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Brendan Lally - uploaded by Yjenith - nominated by Yjenith -- Yjenith (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yjenith (talk) 03:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the crop is too tight for me, the vessel on the bottom-right corner is blurry. Dipankan001 (talk) 05:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 12:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the crop is too tight. Noise (see legs). Bad movement control. Perspective distorition or tilted IMO (see horizon)--Miguel Bugallo 21:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Lmbuga. –Makele-90 (talk) 22:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A dog sleeps in road, Lalbagh, India.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 03:46:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Nagarjun - uploaded by Yjenith - nominated by Yjenith -- Yjenith (talk) 03:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yjenith (talk) 03:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice. The dog is in focus, but there's a general blur, probably caused by the 300mm focal lenght and very shaky hands. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow. The dog is unclassified. The quality isn't OK, it is too unsharp for an FP-image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alocasia cuprea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 03:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as creator. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice photo, but I don't think the framing is optimal. Tomer T (talk) 10:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 16:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QuestionHi Tomer and Katarighe, thanks a lot for your comments. Because this is the first time I've nominated a picture for featured status, I might need some help. Is there any way to improve the photo? What I like about this shot is the three-dimensionality and yet almost abstract way how the leaves fill the picture (and I don't mind the slight asymmetry) and also its stunning tonality. Is there a way to frame the current content differently? (e.g. through cropping) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm afraid that with the current content it won't be possible to frame it better. What I dislike about the framing is that all the leafs are cut-off, cropping can't change that. Regards, Tomer T (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info I totally get your point. Fortunately, I took another picture in portrait orientation. What about this one? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This one's better. I'm not sure it has enough 'wow' to be a FP. I'll wait for other voters to express their opinions. Tomer T (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support They both look like quality works of art yet are stunningly real. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 14:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Essam Sharaf (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

The chosen alternative is: File:Alocasia cuprea (portrait orientation).jpg

File:CROP. Corvus monedula, naakka, Naantalin hautausmaa, Naantali, 8.11.2011..jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2012 at 21:13:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Makele-90. Leucistic Jackdaw (Corvus monedula) with strange white feathers in Naantali cemetery, Naantali, Finland. –Makele-90 (talk) 21:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author. –Makele-90 (talk) 21:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 22:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 07:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crispness in the face is missing which is one of the most important quality characteristics of bird FP. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Pudelek (talk) 10:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Rustic Cupha erymanthis by kadavoor.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 09:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor - nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 11:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful shot --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:49, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a too dark area (annotated) + blurry antenna. Tomer T (talk) 12:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes; dark background due to the bright sunlight. I can brighten it a bit but afraid that it will fade the wings. And some motion blur on the antenna; because she was enjoying the minerals. :) Just some positive thoughts. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 07:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 08:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 21:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 12:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:17143 Bukowiec kosciol 2.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 06:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Silu - uploaded by Silu - nominated by Silu -- silu (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- silu (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- A bit dark, but the real problem for me is that unfortunate shadow across the front of the building. —Bruce1ee^talk 08:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 12:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice lighting indeed, but the shadows on the main subject are very distracting. The little thing in the sky at left should be cloned away imo. A nice photo nevertheless. --Cayambe (talk) 22:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the shadows and per others. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:22, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombia Mapa Oficial.svg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 00:44:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Shadowxfox - uploaded by Shadowxfox - nominated by Shadowxfox -- Shadowxfox (talk) 00:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shadowxfox (talk) 00:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 13:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support brilliant effort Scewing (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 17:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Egg (talk) 21:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I appreciate this kind of effort. --Ximonic (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support professional quality --SajoR (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pudelek (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! DimiTalen (talk) 09:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps

File:Everest-Panorama.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 13:03:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Khumbu range seen from the Merapeak at 6.452m.

Info created by Toppi68 - uploaded by Toppi68 - nominated by Toppi68 -- Toppi68 (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Toppi68 (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quality isn't good enough, and why the captions? It is better to use annotations. Tomer T (talk) 13:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too many dust spots in the sky and per Tomer T. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful picture, but - as Tomer pointed out - the captions are not necessary. DimiTalen (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kolob Canyons part of Zion National Park.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 01:00:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 06:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice --Katarighe (Talk) 12:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 23:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Stu Phillips (talk) 02:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Onychogomphus forcipatus LC0224.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 17:58:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A Small Pinkertail (Onychogomphus forcipatus) created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
Support -- LC-de (talk) 17:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I don't like the background and the DOF is low to me--Miguel Bugallo 21:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 12:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the background is distracting --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 22:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frampton Mansell St Lukes Church.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 00:46:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes! yes! yes! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Splendid photo in every way. SteveStrummer (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 18:18, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 01:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:53, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Imperial Russian soldier with phone.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 16:58:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There might be a copyright issue. - A.Savin 20:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- what? uniform? table oraz lamp? this is not artistic works --Pudelek (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  If yes, than the soldier itself, as it may be considered as 3D artwork; so don't wonder if someone opens an RfD. - A.Savin 18:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me too dark and I can't see anything featurable. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Memorino (talk) 11:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:06, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose See Yikrazuul. DimiTalen (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Yikrazuul--Citron (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olde di Eores.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 15:36:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 15:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author. --Llorenzi (talk) 15:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 16:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 17:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:24, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor quality (unsharp, JPG artifacts, sharpening halos, noisy, chromatic noise in the sky), I reckon due to the camera. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Exactly as kaʁstn + chromatic noise in the mountain of the right--Miguel Bugallo 11:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per kaʁstn. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 14:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster - Queen Christina 02 Crisco restoration.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2012 at 05:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by employee(s) of MGM - uploaded by Crisco 1492 - restored by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:23, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- This image was restored nicely and has great resolution. I'm just not a fan of the composition & artistry. There are so many better examples of masterful artistry & composition within the pre-1940 public domain movie poster genre that could (and should) be added to commons. Scewing (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly working on it, but sadly my connection is not as fast as I'd like it to be, so it takes a long time (from my experience, about 80% of pre-1973 film posters have copyright notices on them, and I don't have access to the renewals archive to check if those are PD). Pre 1940 posters are more likely to be free, but most major studios (except MGM) seem to have figured out their need for a copyright notice around 1935. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support while i agree that the poster composition is not top notch, its still an historic document with a major star, and even its relatively poor composition is now part of its charm. I would oppose less notable stars/movies posters if poorly done, but only as we get more than a smidgen of PD images in the category.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fairies at the Elf Fantasy Fair 2011.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 04:14:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by SpeakFree - uploaded by SpeakFree - nominated by SpeakFree -- S_peakF_ree (talk) 04:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- S_peakF_ree (talk) 04:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, unsharp, see annotations. Dipankan001 (talk) 06:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tilted, the crop. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DimiTalen (talk) 09:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: per above. Tomer T (talk) 11:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Montecchio-Alte Ceccato.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 10:20:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pottercomuneo - uploaded by Pottercomuneo - nominated by Pottercomuneo -- 79.21.196.88 10:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 79.21.196.88 10:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IP voting is not allowed, please log in to vote. --Katarighe (Talk) 13:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the file has not uploaded- Katarighe (Talk) 13:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

,

File:Albrecht Dürer, Adam and Eve, 1504, Engraving.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 23:00:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Albrecht Dürer - uploaded & nominated by Scewing -- Scewing (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Scewing (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support good scan and nice piece of art. Tomer T (talk) 20:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼苦情処理係 21:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ 不是任何人都能接受裸体照片的，尽管他们知道这幅图片的背景知识。 Not people from every culture can accept a picture with naked bodies although they know the background knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack No1 (talk • contribs)
- Not enough edits to vote. Tomer T (talk) 21:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I cannot understand the previous comment. Anyway I like this scanned version. Well done --Llorenzi (talk) 08:28, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Tomer T is referring to the rules for "voting" here, where one needs to have 50 edits and at least a 10 days old account. Hadn't noticed that rule before.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great addition to the Featured Pictures. DimiTalen (talk) 09:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would have qualified as picture of the year in 1504. lone opposers argument is completely irrelevant, out of scope of WC policies.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Common Lime Butterfly Papilio demoleus by Kadavoor.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 09:16:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jkadavoor (talk) - uploaded by Jkadavoor (talk) - nominated by Jkadavoor (talk) -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- This butterfly was sleeping on an inner branch of a bush; so I've a limitation to put my camera through to get an uninterrupted view. Jkadavoor (talk) 09:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 12:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 13:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- This one is much better! I'll be glad to nominate it myself after the sharpening fringing is removed. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Keep uploading! --Paolo Costa (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful! Tiptoety ^talk 00:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. It is interesting to see what such type of a camera (non-DSLR) is capable of. I had FZ18 and I liked it quite much. --Ximonic (talk) 15:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 09:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Euroleague - LE Roma vs Toulouse IC-27.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 06:54:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by PierreSelim -- PierreSelim (talk) 06:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PierreSelim (talk) 06:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition is good. The quality is very good (sport-event without light). And I like the fuzzy of the ball ! Ludo (talk) 07:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 07:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality action shot with value. I also like how dirty their hands are from manoeuvring the wheelchairs. --NJR_ZA (talk) 10:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quite a detailed image and the information it conveys is even more so. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good and very useful!--ArildV (talk) 23:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Firestorm of Star Birth in Galaxy Centaurus A.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2012 at 07:22:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA, - uploaded by Dipankan001 - nominated by Dipankan001 -- Dipankan001 (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support High educational value and is also featured picture in NASA. -- Dipankan001 (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support good photo--David საქართველო 08:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~(Formerly FPXed) Oppose The resolution is much to small. 2MP are needed. - Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)}}~~[reply]
- Can't be FPXed because there is another supporter apart from the nominator. Tomer T (talk) 15:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Tomer T (talk) 15:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:22, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Much too small. Yann (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have removed the comment above as high res version have been uploaded. Dipankan001 (talk) 06:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent image. Contains educational Value. AJ.iitm (talk) 21:30, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded high-resolution version. Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 23:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't know. It looks to me like an average space photo. We also have space shots with much higher resolution. Tomer T (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That really doesn't matter. Dipankan001 (talk) 04:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Foix - Château et ville.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 12:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by User:BastienM -- BastienM (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overtreatment of the image. Visible in the management of chiaroscuro and color unnatural. With compression disorder seen in the sky and the tree line from the bottom. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too dull colors for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose dull colors, wrong white balance? -- -donald- (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 15:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great composition, but bad colors. DimiTalen (talk) 09:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gavialis gangeticus in Prague.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2012 at 18:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Egg - uploaded by Egg - nominated by Chmee2 -- Chmee2 (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info adjusted levels and denoised by --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, kaʁstn! :-) --Egg (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much nicer now. Thank you really much kaʁstn for your edit! --Chmee2 (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better than original. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Impressive--Miguel Bugallo 11:20, 10 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

weak oppose Per others--Miguel Bugallo 00:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Info added exif data from the camera --Egg (talk) 12:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hunger! --Schnobby (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 18:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tlusťa (talk) 19:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 09:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Memorino (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Are they really that green? It looks like this image may have been color enhanced, which gives the crocodile an artificial color. Compare to this image of a Gavialis gangeticus, as well as this one from the same zoo. Scewing (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the light conditions, I took the picture inside the pavilion. Though the light of fluorescent lamps appeared clear white to me, there are several green plants around that may change the ambient color. I uploaded the picture as it came from my camera and it was even more green compared to this adjusted version. I think there is nothing like "real colors" in digital photography. They looked like this in my eyes. --Egg (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ɑηsuмaη ^{ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ} 12:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the color is not natural. I have never seen a green crocodile teeth! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --If the artificial green tint was a result of the fluorescent lamps at the zoo exhibit per Egg's comment above, then I oppose due to poor lighting conditions. Scewing (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the teeth, those in the back row are more white compared to the green in the front row. That suggests there is an artificial green light installed in the crocodile exposition, hidden to the eyes of visitors. But I don't think it makes the picture worse. On the contrary, the light was chosen by the zoo staff because it looks good. --Egg (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I uploaded another version with less green in the file history. But I'm really not sure if it's better... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose simply false colors. Otherwise nice image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alchemist-hp (talk • contribs) 17:37, 13 March 2012 UTC (UTC)
~~Oppose~~ Ehmm yes... the green teeth is not very normal. But I also dislike composition, the distracting background, the badly cropped lower crocodile. I did not oppose because the majority obviously liked it but, I think the green teeth and general weird color is truly a must oppose. --Paolo Costa (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I apologize for saying colors were wrong because of the green teeth; I checked again the full res version. Green teeth are only in one zone. The teeth in the back row are very white, WB seems completely fine now. Must have been some reflection of vegetation or lights in the zoo on the front teeth. I remove my negative vote. It is a wonderful animal... I still don't like the crop, and comparing to other gavials in the article, the color seems still weird, I can't be sure, so: Neutral.--Paolo Costa (talk) 17:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Look like highlighters... Totodu74 (talk) 18:28, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as others. -- -donald- (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I prefer natural light in this kind of informative picture of animal species. Atleast for a FP. --Ximonic (talk) 14:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all other opponents.--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see most pictures of this subject in water are green at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gharial ; so agree with the contributor's opinion that "there are several green plants around that may change the ambient color". Green subjects only reflect that part of the light so a white tooth may looks green. I have lot of similar results. If subject required a greeny environment like plants and water ferns (not green lights) we can't put it in a concrete tank to take photos! -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think Jkadavoor makes a good point. There are several examples of this species being quite green especialy in captivity. The teeth issue is a bit of a red herring in that only a few teeth on the top row are picking up some ambient light (reflection off the water perhaps?). Nobody would be decieved by this image and it is very captivating. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excellent composition and very interesting... but for FPs natural colours are required imo. --Cayambe (talk) 03:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Citron (talk) 15:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 17:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ximonic and Cayambe. --Cephas (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 11 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niagara falls - Winter - Prospect point view at night.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2012 at 18:25:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Paolo Costa (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a bit noisy, too much and too dominant foreground, the framing looks really bad to me. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the framing and foreground. Tomer T (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed only the noise, because I like the snowy foreground with the funny-looking frozen branches, and the framing. --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As kaʁstn--Miguel Bugallo 11:18, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 15:50, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Carschten + overexposed area. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but what overexposed area do you refer to? --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. I didn't find any larger blown areas. Only some tiny white spots in the upper part of the image (some light sources and such + just a little on the blue water fall part behind). But nothing very critical in my opinion. --Ximonic (talk) 23:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ximonic --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Carschten + overexposed area. --Llorenzi (talk) 08:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 17:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Picoides pubescens f CT3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2012 at 01:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by Cephas -- Cephas (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- Cephas (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice and perhaps FP to me. I'm thinking because the image can be cropped IMO (see note). What you think?--Miguel Bugallo 10:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand and agree. But my philosphy with the crop question is, within a possible range of crop (very subjective, I know), to always choose the largest one. This for two reasons : I like to see the subject breathing in its environment and, I like to leave the choice to the eventual user to crop the picture if he wants to, and the way he whiches (the licence gives the freedom for this). My pictures are often used inside and outside Wikimedia projects. For a strict illustration of the species, a tight crop is perfect, but pictures can be used in different ways and I like to foresee this. --Cephas (talk) 17:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - A well reasoned position but perhaps do the suggested crop then add this as an alternate version. Best of both worlds. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ see above --Miguel Bugallo 21:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support--Miguel Bugallo 21:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question Did you use flash? –Makele-90 (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I don't have flash. It's the reflection of the sun on the snow and lighting the bird from below. I was standing slighty above the bird and the background is snow (not sky and clouds). --Cephas (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support. Here it is. You know, I find this one better actually... --Cephas (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Cayambe (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Memorino (talk) 10:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 21:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Totodu74 (talk) 18:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

The chosen alternative is: File:Picoides pubescens f CTB.jpg

File:Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 17:40:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jack_No1 - uploaded by Jack_No1 - nominated by Jack_No1 -- Jack No1 (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jack No1 (talk) 17:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nominator currently sits at 50 edits on Commons courtesy of several votes and nominations to this project. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Date stamp. DimiTalen (talk) 09:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality and date stamp but i like the composition.--ArildV (talk) 10:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: reason - Time StampMercurywoodrose (talk) 03:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Sagami Temple 2600px.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2012 at 18:48:12

Info Overexposure (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 18:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Cathy Richards (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 18:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mmmm quite delistable, but I don't know. It is very original, it's something different with beautiful colors and symmetry. It is a picture of a gorgeous piece of art. Perhaps it would be better to attempt a recovery of blown areas instead of delisting? Overexposure is really not that bad in this pic. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ablaufventil mit Exzenter offen nummeriert.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 18:09:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by Niabot -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼苦情処理係 18:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know the correct terms in English language, someone should add them to the description. Notice: It is part of row of multiple images. See gallery inside the description page. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼苦情処理係 18:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 22:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--A slightly more blur to the background would be better--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 08:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 21:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Lenangstindane and Jægervasstindane in Lyngen, 2012 March.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2012 at 22:26:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Lenangstindane and Jægervasstindane in the Lyngen alps, Troms, Norway. Created, uploaded and nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Ximonic (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Applause... all is featurable here. --Paolo Costa (talk) 01:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 17:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 23:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning location. All that white makes it a rather difficult shot to take and get sharp detail. --NJR_ZA (talk) 15:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mahtava kuva taas kerran. --Stryn (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with all the above --Bthv (talk) 22:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not enough edits to vote. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 03:10, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 00:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 01:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Mujer indígena de Cuetzalan.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 03:18:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Miguel Pacheco -- 189.128.19.21 03:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- 189.128.19.21 03:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support "Me impactó todo lo que refleja la mujer con solo verla ademaás de que refleja las contumbres y tradiciones de todo un pueblo" Noyolcont 21:30 14 Marzo 2012
Comment The two votes above won't be counted, as one is IP and the other has less than 50 edits. Dipankan001 (talk) 05:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing featurable to me. Tomer T (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 13:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pictures of people are usually very interesting and this is not an exception either. The picture emphasizes there has to be a story behind the person and that is good. However, the focus seems to be mainly on the carrying and arm while the face is comparably unsharp. Atleast I'd like the face to be the most sharp part in the picture and that is what I expect. I would also like if the picture had been taken from a little lower. I'm not sure what to think about the shade on face while the rest of this person seem to be in quite good a light. --Ximonic (talk) 14:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can't see the person's facial features, it's in a kind of a "degrading" way, as it's a top-down image. I'd rather had seen it was taken from straight up front. --Bthv (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DimiTalen (talk) 09:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 11:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wackershofen Freilandmuseum Dorfkapelle Stoecken 20070716 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 10:50:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Rosenzweig - uploaded by Rosenzweig - nominated by Memorino -- Memorino (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Memorino (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice image, nice quality, can be QI, but I don't see nothing featurable. Tomer T (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 17:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Missing wow effect. --Egg (talk) 21:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Tomer T. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition. Albertus teolog (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty picture, but too plain for me. DimiTalen (talk) 09:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 19:08:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - very nice, but not FP for me. Crop too tight on both left and right, and plant on the left is distracting. Sorry. --Claritas (talk) 19:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request perhaps a copyvio? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is art in public space --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wladysalw's right, there's freedom of panorama in Germany. --Claritas (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we have "freedom of panorama in Germany", but I think not only for the part of the arts. Take a look to Christo too. It was also an art in the publik space, but we don't habe images of his arts. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad comparison. Christos work was from the beginning planed to be not permanently. This art work is not planed to be demolished by the artist. This is an evident difference. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, amazing graffiti. But crop is soooo tight, sadly. Also distracting branches shadows over it. --Paolo Costa (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tight crop focuses on the art work. What's wrong about this? Would you prefer s.th. like this File:Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti2.jpg? The branches are part of this composition because it's an urban graffiti and not a picture in a gallery. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is wrong with it. It is just not an optimal crop imo, as it should be for a FP. As for the branches, sometimes third agents like a branch, a lamp post, trash, etc. can be disturbing... it may not be the photographer's fault and they might be unavoidable. Still it makes the picture not featurable. I'd like a crop like this one, for example: http://www.arturban.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/daim-07.jpg --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Yes, FP for me -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. German FoP should apply. - A.Savin 18:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Claritas: nothing special for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tight crop --Citron (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support.Tight crop on the left. I like the branches of the tree and shadows merging with the graffiti, should be a bit more to give the impression of the surroundings, anyhow FP! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Solar Police (talk) 14:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose tight crop for me too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marmolada nelle Dolomiti.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 20:16:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A bit darkish. Quite good picture of a portion of mountain so this picture can be useful as well. Color vibrancy could be increased a little also. Long story short: I find this image useful, quality is quite good but I do not concider the picture a Featured one. --Ximonic (talk) 08:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 12:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the subject and also the quality of the picture --Llorenzi (talk) 08:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pottercomuneo (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC) Only two edits on Commons including this one. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sorry, what do you mean by "only two edits on Commons"? There must be an error!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Pottercomuneo had only 2 edits when I looked. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I got you, I did not understand that the reviewer was ment in this case --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment sorry, amazing picture anyway --Pottercomuneo (talk) 14:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 23:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zell - Füürige-Marcher-Brunnen.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 19:05:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – SteveStrummer (talk) 14:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the harsh shadows and the distracting background. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alchemist-hp. Tomer T (talk) 13:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erannis-defoliaria-Raupe-Frostspanner.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 14:19:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mottled Umber (caterpillar), Erannis defoliaria, Family: Geometridae, Location: Germany, Ochsenwang

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 14:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautifully ugly. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ugly? Why ugly? It's a very beautiful caterpillar --Schnobby (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has a face only its mother could love:) Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cephas (talk) 21:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stu Phillips (talk) 02:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 16:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 00:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:31, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support and Comment I am wondering why nobody is complaining about the flash? I have seen users oppose on grounds of artificial lighting. --Jovian Eye _storm 01:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the reason is that in this pic the subject is in such a position that the flash does not do a bad effect on the background, nor does it show harsh shadows under it (the subj.). Light is not too harsh, and looks well distributed throughout the subject, helping the fact that it is linear. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Vulcan 0302.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 01:01:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I haven't been here in a long time. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(weak) Oppose nice light and motion blur of the background, but it's a normal touchdown (no wow) and there are several distracting elements in the background. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to agree that the tower behind the tail is the worst element of the photo. I was thinking of removing it but the clouded sky would have made it too difficult for me. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support moim zdaniem ten startujący potwór to jednak ma w sobie coś z wow. Wieże mi nie przeszkadzają --Pudelek (talk) 11:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- On ląduje... Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 15:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Im sorry, its a good and useful photo but the background is to distracting.--ArildV (talk) 10:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Im sorry, as ArildV--Miguel Bugallo 01:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Mi-35 8044.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 11:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info everything by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good to see you around again Lukasz! I don't see major problems at full view + there's wow effect (if possible a version with a bit more space on lower part would be great). --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:27, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Athabasca Rail at Brule Lake.jpg, delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 10:39:31

Info Weird colors, grainy, bad crop from the right, we have much better photos of this type (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 10:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Major technical issues (ones mentioned + bad lighting) with no strong reasons to keep (no big wow, no huge EV, no detail, low quality...) --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist ouch. Terrible (sorry!) wrong colours, poor quality. Analog photography? Missing details of that at the description page. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Cathy Richards (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Paolo. --Kadellar (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 15:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist ...although knowing about the conditions back then makes this picture very interesting. But the white balance is very dubious. Quality is like from some very old photograph. I was very surprised it has been taken in 2006. Too bad this picture is difficult to retake. --Ximonic (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
strong keep WFT?! This image looks amazing! --Lošmi (talk) 20:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree, nice loooking image. --Karelj (talk) 17:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 2 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Breithorn Enzian 2005-06-11.jpg, delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2012 at 10:44:29

Info Bad foreground and general composition, bad lighting (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Composition looks random. Picture looks snapshottish. Large blown areas. I think it could be delisted. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Citron (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist nice motive and situation (idea), but per nom --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --Kadellar (talk) 22:52, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 15:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --Cayambe (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:JohnHancocksSignature.svg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 03:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by John Hancock - uploaded & nominated by Scewing -- Scewing (talk) 03:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Copy of Hancock's signature from the United States Declaration of Independence, which made his name synonymous with signature in the United States.
Support -- Scewing (talk) 03:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --BastienM (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Seriously? Thats a mere automated conversion to SVG from the original image with missing details and distortions due to bad conversion. No way that this could be considered a featured picture. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼苦情処理係 12:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same opinion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad quality. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Quite a bit of the signature is missing, isn't it? SteveStrummer (talk) 16:19, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 没意义 It makes no sense.

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirepoix - Cathédrale et château de Terride.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 12:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by User:BastienM -- BastienM (talk) 12:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice, but I don't like the simple centered composition. And please remove the dust spots. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A bit plain, isn't it? DimiTalen (talk) 09:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orange flame tulip.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 06:15:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Photos Public Domain - uploaded and nominated by Dipankan001 (talk) 06:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dipankan001 (talk) 06:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp, low DOF. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alchemist. DimiTalen (talk) 09:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schneckenhand.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 17:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Schnecke in der Hand eines Kindes (snail in child hand)

Info created by Slick - uploaded by Slick - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - out of scope. --Claritas (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the hand. --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 08:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per SteGrifo27. Tomer T (talk) 13:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zoom effect.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 14:10:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by B166ER(de wikipedia) - uploaded by B166ER (de wikipedia)- nominated by Gauravjuvekar -- Gauravjuvekar (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gauravjuvekar (talk) 14:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request:Please see the QI nomination so that we don't have to argue on the same points.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I've seen the discussion on QIC, and yet I don't know if the picture is good or not. I know what is zooming effect, I try sometimes to realized such kind of picture with my 70-200, just for fun because not only girls just want to have fun. Yet it's a technical effect, I dunno how to review it. Good luck for this nomination, and I hope the comments and discussion will be fructfull. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 15:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technical image that does have no effect WOW --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel really dizzy about this picture! I think many people will go to hospital if it is enlarged and put onto the homepage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack No1 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When I look at this picture, I get a feeling of being drunk... "Zoom Effect" isn't the thing that comes to mind, really. --Bthv (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others--Miguel Bugallo 01:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I realize that it is hard to get this kind of technical picture into the QI gallery. But, in its genre, it's a fine picture. It gets my support. DimiTalen (talk) 09:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agora and El Puente de l'Assut de l'Or Bridge.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 18:12:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 18:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose noisy, and don't like the composition. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not sure about any noise but those dust spots will have to be fixed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Dust and localised NR. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A bit better, but still some noise and now loss of details; so still not featured. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:06, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 10:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:48, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 01:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 17:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Irish peasant farmer smoking pipe, 1890s.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 15:31:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Photoglob Zürich, reprinted by Detroit Publishing Co. - imported from flickr - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Totodu74 (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Colin (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Palais de l'Industrie - Édouard Baldus.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 21:50:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Édouard Baldus - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 21:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 22:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:38, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Pont des Invalides - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2012 at 23:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Could use noise reduction in the sky, but to me, very nice. --Paolo Costa (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:53, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Very pretty at a small size, but at 100% there is a lot of noise and no real detail. The blown highlights in the bridge seem like a lost opportunity to establish focus. SteveStrummer (talk) 16:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very noisy and lack of details. The down part on the water can be also cropped out. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alchemist-hp and SteveStrummer. Dipankan001 (talk) 05:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very aesthetic. Albertus teolog (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Tomer T (talk) 11:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Steve. Colin (talk) 21:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siproeta stelenes meridionalis MHNT.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 15:20:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 15:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 15:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Very pretty and quite the striking contrast. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 22:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Cathy Richards (talk) 22:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:33, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 09:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm very lucky with my subjects: they are very patient. Thank you all and especially to Citron that has a lot of artistic sense :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support For sure. Totodu74 (talk) 13:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colin (talk) 21:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Capri Centre Belvedere.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 04:28:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Panoramic image. Second nomination. Last time it was quickly withdrawn because of geotag problems, now solved. All by --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 10:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! Jujutacular (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the detail. Great picture. --Colin (talk) 22:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why the warning on top "Downsampled image!|This image has been downsampled, and is not eligible for Featured Picture status" ? -- Jkadavoor (talk) 04:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There used to be a rule downsampled images were not eligible for FP, since everyone would try to use Commons to upload mid or low-sized images and then try to sell high-res versions or something like that. Only full-size versions should be nominated for FP. This one has the tag because the robot recognizes it as a downsampled image, since it is a stitched panorama and has been cropped and resized while stitching. I think the tag is not taken into consideration anymore, but I'm not sure. --Paolo Costa (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Turkish Stars Going Up 20-July-2011.tif

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 22:30:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ira Goldstein - uploaded by Ira Goldstein - nominated by Ira Goldstein -- Igoldste (talk) 22:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Igoldste (talk) 22:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unknown perspective - in which direction flies the plane? Why Tiff-Format? -- -donald- (talk) 11:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The plane was flying straight up. I had hoped that the flag flying from the yard-arm would have provided context. Do you think that there is any way to re-crop it to improve the perspective/composition? Thanks. --Igoldste (talk) 15:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 12:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose confusing composition. Tomer T (talk) 12:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What I don't like about the composition is not that it's confusing. I like that, air shows tend to be confusing in such a way from time to time. But I dislike the amount of empty space, the jet and flag take up to little of the area. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Igoldste (talk) 03:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arctocephalus pusillus Zoo Praha 2011-1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2012 at 22:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The photo quality is good enough. PS: How lovely it is! --Jack No1 (talk) 17:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but i can't see anything special here. For me it is a "simple" zoo-snapshot.--mathias K 14:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:42, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per mathias. ■ MMXX ^talk 16:56, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per mathias & boring composition --Citron (talk) 11:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No Wow effetc --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canal Grande from Rialto Bridge Venice.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2012 at 17:45:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the shadowed right part. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Alchemist --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have slightly brightened the right shadows and uploaded a new version. Revert to original, if you don't like. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hast mir in meinen Gedanken gelesen, but I thought that the original file is QI, if I'd change it, QI might not apply anymore. That's why I did not upload a brightened file, which looks definetly better, and was waiting to submit it again. Anyway, thanks a lot for your help and support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Durga Puja beauty.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2012 at 15:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, nominated and uploaded by Dipankan001 (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dipankan001 (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp. In addition, a more symmetric composition and a different point of view would have created a better image. Tomer T (talk) 15:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp. --Cayambe (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to unsharp. And how about your whitebalance? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:52, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp/wrong white balance --BastienM (talk) 19:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done Sharpened image and fixed other things. Dipankan001 (talk) 09:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:34, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fontaine des Fleuves.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2012 at 21:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pierre-Louis Ferrer - uploaded by Pierre-Louis Ferrer - nominated by Danh -- Danh (talk) 21:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danh (talk) 21:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 22:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose What a pity... the quality. The wow is huge, terrific image, very beautiful. But look, there is a lot of noise (avoidable, since exp time is long), there are many dead pixels all over the picture (not stars), big CA's, lots of Chromatic noise, and lens flare too, as if UV filter was left on. --Paolo Costa (talk) 01:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose + dust spots (drops?), + strong distortions. I see this fountain four times a day when I go to job, and I can say that I've never seen it so. Even for a night shot, the colors are completely artificial to me. This image was rejected in the Quality Image Candidates page and did not obtain the label...--Jebulon (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose all looks very artificial, but the tilt distortion of the Concorde obelisk is realy unpleasant to see IMO --Moonik (talk) 10:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as other --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the quality isn't OK for an FP-image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As others--Miguel Bugallo 00:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Tomer T (talk) 11:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trafalgar Square, fountain and National Gallery - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2012 at 17:44:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 17:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 17:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know that it's not simple to get high-quality architecture pics by night. This one has almost no noise and that is a good result already. However, there are other issues: the non-symmetrical view as well as the composition with the fountain in big parts of the foreground is not very impressive, and additionally the part of the facade with the colonnade seems overexposed / blown-out in the lighting. At the very left part, some unpleasant scaffolds are visible. Maybe it's better to wait till the restauration is over? - A.Savin 19:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree. The composition bothers me most. DimiTalen (talk) 06:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:35, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow GUM Middle Line view from 2nd floor.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 13:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by A.Savin
Neutral - A.Savin 13:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:40, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good. I like that the skylight is blue rather than blow-out white, which is often the case. The lower darker part shows a little chroma noise, which Lightroom or Photoshop could help remove (not sure about Elements). Colin (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Nanjing Yuejianglou Tower.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 17:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jack_No1 - uploaded by Jack_No1 - nominated by Jack_No1 -- Jack No1 (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jack No1 (talk) 17:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor quality and watermarked. --ELEKHH^T 04:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a FP. Quick snap, low quality (lots of noise an not sharp) , bad composition (what is with the roof in the foreground?) and contains a camera date/time stamp. --NJR_ZA (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I completely agree with NJR_ZA, and to add to that: I nominate this FPX --Bthv (talk) 22:36, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry Bthv, not enough edits to vote. FPX template can't be used in this situation either. Please check the rules Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Date stamp, to name one thing. DimiTalen (talk) 09:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Cloud Église Saint-Clodoald 001.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 17:35:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created uploaded and nominated by -- Moonik (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moonik (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to dark, false white balance = false colors. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Question What is wrong with the white balance? The colours appear natural to me. The blue of the sky was perhaps a bit intensified but no issue IMO. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 12:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Weird crop. DimiTalen (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice image, but limited WOW-factor. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 12:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012-03-14 21-42-55-file-etoiles-14f-2min-3d.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 19:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support does do a wow for me --Jovian Eye _storm 01:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support So good! Your other image lacks a bit of contrast between stars and sky, but this one is great. --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The larger the screen the better this looks. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support It tells well how the city light pollution affects the starry sky. --Ximonic (talk) 12:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 11:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent example of star precession. Royalbroil 12:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 11:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Hammarby vs GAIS 2012-02-11.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 23:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 23:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 23:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a fine photo, sharp and good quality, but from a sport FP I would expect some action and movement. Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't convince me. DimiTalen (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. In a photo called Hammarby vs GAIS I would expect to see two teams in action, not just some players standing around with their back to the camera. --NJR_ZA (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing special. Botend (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:20, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melitaea britomartis podgorje01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 20:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by kulac - uploaded by kulac - nominated by kulac -- Kulac (talk) 20:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice in preview, but evil color noise in full mode, unfortunately. - A.Savin 20:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per A. Savin. Nice, very good resolution and size, but the head of the butterfly is too noisy, luck of details to me--Miguel Bugallo 21:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm ok with the noise, but I feel there is a mis-focus here. I would at least expect the wings to be sharp and well focused. --Jovian Eye _storm 01:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 12:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I really like the picture, but there is too much noise. -- Achird (talk) 21:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 09:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montecchio Maggiore, Italy.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 14:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pottercomuneo - uploaded by Pottercomuneo - nominated by Pottercomuneo -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 14:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know that green could seem false but it had just rained and the color was very vivid. I tried to edit the picture to "muffle" the green but I have not had good results. --Pottercomuneo (talk) 16:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice scene, but I think a better photo can be taken here. The haze in the air spoils the photo rather than contribute to it. --NJR_ZA (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown-out upper part. Please choose a different time of day. - A.Savin 20:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 12:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question so you suggest to take it again a limpid morning? (here it's evening) --Pottercomuneo (talk) 10:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the sun at your back will give a lovely saturation to the colours and much better light to the sky. It is a great view so certainly worth trying again. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Yes try it again on another time. -- -donald- (talk) 11:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:17332 Dabrowka wlkp palac 6.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2012 at 18:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Silu - uploaded by Silu - nominated by Silu -- silu (talk) 18:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- silu (talk) 18:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral good picture, but the truck on the right really bothers me Botend (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark. -- -donald- (talk) 08:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its not too dark it just need a serious crop. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Tomer T (talk) 07:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Callejón de Cuetzalan.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 03:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont (talk)21:25 23 Marzo 2012

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: composition, unclear subject --Gnan garra 05:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Caída de la lluvia por unas esclaeras en Cuetzalan.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 03:29:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 03:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont (talk)21:30 23 Marzo 2012

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: to dark, poor lighting --Gnan garra 05:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Dark Days Are Coming.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 13:02:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Taro Taylor - uploaded by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good and unusual. But what is the strange black spot on the water just below the highest peak? - A.Savin 21:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jujutacular (talk) 02:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Grandmaster 09:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 21:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice image--David საქართველო 11:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AlphaEta (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Egunt07 Fantastic image, but what is with the black dot in the middle of the picture in the water?

I might guess it has something to do with fishing... A mark for a trap, fishing net or similar. Can't be sure though. --Ximonic (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

File:Final Trophee Monal 2012 n08.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 07:36:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jastrow - uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by PierreSelim -- PierreSelim (talk) 07:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support An excellent shot of a Flèche attack (and a counter-attack) during the final of trophée Monal (a world cup tournament). It's an indoor action which can excuse the noise and probably one of the best fencing shot we have on commons. -- PierreSelim (talk) 07:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Totally excusable high ISO. Also noise it is not that bad on subject. It is a fantastic shot imo. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a 6,5 MPx photo, so the noise is not that big of a problem. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 13:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice ArildV (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Great wow factor, great illustrative qualities: an outstanding action shot! SteveStrummer (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 20:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jujutacular (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Grandmaster 09:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 21:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 11:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Magnifique ! Peut-être la page de description pourrait-elle préciser, pour les béotiens dont je suis, et pour une utilisation encyclopédique ultérieure, de quelle arme il s'agit ? (Epée). Newbie question: What kind of weapon is it, please ? --Jebulon (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment la seule vraie arme l'épée (désolé pour ce troll). // It's épée. --PierreSelim (talk) 16:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:57, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 22:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:2011-09-30 Bonn BPS Poseidon.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2012 at 22:19:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sir James - uploaded by Sir James - nominated by Sir James -- Sir James (talk) 22:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sir James (talk) 22:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:30, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good photo, but it doesn't stand out amongst boat photos. Tomer T (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't convince me. DimiTalen (talk) 09:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info I'd like to terminate this election and move the photo to "quality images". Deleting this file isn't allowed here; how's this possible? Greets --Sir James (talk) 08:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Place {{withdraw}} --~~~~, the rest will be done by bot. - A.Savin 11:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK - thanks, Alexander! Greets --Sir James (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Sir James (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benny Trapp Alytes cisternasii.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 21:20:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by User:Benny Trapp - uploaded by User:Benny Trapp - nominated by Achim Raschka (talk) -- Achim Raschka (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achim Raschka (talk) 21:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great DOF and sharpness. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 21:31, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 22:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:48, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 23:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice toad, excellent photo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow - golden eyes! --Schnobby (talk) 08:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 18:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 11:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Crisp and clear yet still conveys the camouflage at work: a wonderful shot! SteveStrummer (talk) 04:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achird (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 08:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians

File:Harescombe Church.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2012 at 22:25:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Interesting picture, but I have my doubts: clouds are overexposed and the green looks a bit darkish. DimiTalen (talk) 09:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty picture. Colin (talk) 21:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achird (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bit too dark, wrong white balance (too brownish) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too Brownish? Obviously you haven't seen Cotswold Limestone. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I haven't, but I don't need to to see the image (I refer not only to the church) needs a white balance adjustment. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make any sense to me. The church has the wrong white balance but the rest of the image is OK. Just for your info the stones are golden brown to browninsh ashlar limestone. So while it might appear wrong to you I can attest that it is in fact correct. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Giudecca from the Church of San Giorgio Maggiore 001.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 15:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Moonik -- Moonik (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moonik (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of the tight composition: the baluster (not sure that's the correct word) on the bottom right is distracting, trees on the left are cut-off and messy in general. Tomer T (talk) 18:10, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great shot, but Tomer is right about the "baluster" thing. Also, I would crop a bit of the sky. DimiTalen (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I prefer this version; unfortunately I can't yet vote, I've less than 50 edits :/ --Pottercomuneo (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info the disturbing baluster and a bit of the sky are croped in new version.
Support Looks good now. - A.Savin 19:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but now the top of the roof in the bottom-middle is disturbing and out-of-context. Tomer T (talk) 21:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danaus chrysippus Female by kadavoor.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 05:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 08:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not for FP --Böhringer (talk) 11:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - background too soft, not enough depth of focus. --Claritas (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop is a bit tight imo. Little blurry spots, mainly in some areas of the flower, especially in the yellow parts. Looks like denoising was badly applied on some zones. Also some artifacts. Small blown areas on wings. Maybe a bit oversaturated as well? Sorry, I do like the picture and the background, but I see many problems for FP. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:37, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to many blurry areas for an FP image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination as per Paolo -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agriocnemis splendidissima by kadavoor.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 08:41:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jkadavoor - uploaded by Jkadavoor - nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A small black and blue damselfly (dartlet), only 18mm long prefer to perch on tiny grass just inches above the ground level. So the camera is on the ground, getting a firm support. Jkadavoor (talk) 08:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, nice catch and i like the background. But imo the overall image quality isn't good enough for a FP-macro (oversharpend and missing details). The "bug-bar" is pretty high... --mathias K 13:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cúpula de la Catedral de Cuetzalan.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 02:39:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 02:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont(talk) 20:36 21 Marzo 2012
Oppose Underexposed, flat contrasts, strange crop --Martin Kraft (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 12:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you please explain in few words, as a coutesy for the author, why do you oppose ? Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 16:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Planta de café de Cuetzalan.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 23:15:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 23:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont(talk) 17:14 21 Marzo 2012
Oppose. Sorry, but the fruits are unsharp. Did you use a tripod? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 12:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Elisabeth group Rudolf Moroder detail.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 13:12:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Kraft (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 11:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 11:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Sarcoscypha austriaca 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 15:11:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 09:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special, unsharp background, not good angle for taking image. --Karelj (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sometimes centered composition works better. It almost became a rule to move objects from the center to avoid negative votes. In this case it is a nice mushroom but I really don't like the composition. There are no balancing areas on the left either to justify the displacement of the suject to the right. Maybe a vertical crop would have been better? --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support This picture is special because it is useful and it is beautiful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support And would fit too with the cropping suggested by Paolo. Totodu74 (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great detail on the mushroom and nicely lit and defocussed background. However, I agree with Paolo that a portrait crop would be better (I've tried it and prefer). Colin (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Trithemis aurora male 2 by kadavoor.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 06:11:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorry, if I'm wasting your time. :) -- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:29, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gnan garra 05:08, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 15:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:DTM Mercedes W204 Lauda09 amk.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 17:20:34

Info Shouldn't pictures of racing cars have sufficient lead room? (Original nomination)
Delist -- Gauravjuvekar (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it has sufficient lead room. Until you said so I didn't even thought the crop is tight. The picture in my opinion is stunning. Tomer T (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Voting period ended on 3 Mar 2012 for this image. The support for it was unanimous by respected reviewers. Rather unseemly to go for a de-list this soon. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IMHO too early for delisting. BTW the flames are important... --Pitlane02 _talk 13:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 9366-Kaindy.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2012 at 14:23:47

Info Overexposed, much chromatic noise, messy and cut-off composition (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 14:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Blown areas, yet otherwise nice and an impressive place. --Cayambe (talk) 14:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 13:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and too small as well. --Kadellar (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rogue River Oregon USA.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2012 at 14:27:52

Info Really overexposed and unsharp, also seems oversaturated (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Per above and very visible sharpening artifacts. --Cayambe (talk) 14:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist „much contrast/sharpened. It hurts my eyes“ was written in the original nomination. Yes. Also, per all above. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Katarighe (Talk) 13:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --Kadellar (talk) 17:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boletus luridus 2011 G1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 07:19:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Lurid bolete (Boletus luridus)
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Iconic look. Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 23:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support featurable picture imo, good detail. --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enough. Totodu74 (talk) 13:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose shallow DOF, maladjusted lighting of the background and on the right it's overexposed. Sorry! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, it just doesn't have the WOW one would expect from a featured picture. Botend (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, it just doesn't have the WOW one would expect from a featured picture. ² Béria Lima ^msg 19:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:11, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Dinant Meuse R01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 17:55:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by MJJR - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 17:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Kraft (talk) 17:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 22:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Simply stunning spot. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Beautifully composed and rendered. A definitive picture of Dinant, and a treasure for Commons. SteveStrummer (talk) 04:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jkadavoor (talk) 05:06, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC) only one support please. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this, I really don't know what happened here. --Cayambe (talk) 02:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alchemist, you added this. --Tomer T (talk) 09:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

lol :-D --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uuuups ... a BIG sorry to Cayambe.

--Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :-) --Cayambe (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

strong support one of the best images that I saw here at last time. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:22, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Was there a few years ago, and I think this FP candidates captures the atmosphere well. - Benh (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:24, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --84.248.200.93 11:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Oops! --Ximonic (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 15:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Gours des grottes de Saint Marcel d'Ardèche, France.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2012 at 20:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Getfunky Paris (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 06:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice place and picture! I don't mind the small blown areas in this case. --Ximonic (talk) 10:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crop could've been better... But wow is huge for sure --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is far from perfect, but big WOW! and caves are some of the most difficult places to take photos. --NJR_ZA (talk) 19:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, overexposed and blown areas, and important areas. --Miguel Bugallo 21:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Thought it was a plagia of my own picture (Flickr has some), which is also FP for information : File:Grotte Saint Marcel bassins.jpeg. I think this one has better point of view (but has the flaw mentioned by Miguel). - Benh (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 23:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose low quality (clearly worse than File:Grotte Saint Marcel bassins.jpeg in direct comparison) and no special work, using a wide angle is not enough for a outstanding arrangement --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 21:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support fantastic picture--David საქართველო 11:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- Overexposed and blown areas, see Miguel. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Miguel and Benh. Colin (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown areas, sorry, otherwise an excellent shot. --Cayambe (talk) 15:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I prefer the one we already have featured. Although the wide angle is better here, the light levels and picture quality are better in the one we've got. --99of9 (talk) 03:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Jacobi-Automne Canadien.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 01:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Uploaded by Letartean - nominated by Letartean -- Letartean (talk) 01:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Letartean (talk) 01:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A fine shot and certainly QI worth, but not FP for me. The reflection spots in the sky are disturbing. DimiTalen (talk) 06:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you sure these are reflection spots? I think these spots may be a result of the painting's state of preservation or something. Tomer T (talk) 11:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Benoit Rochon (talk) 08:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Béria Lima ^msg 19:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metropolitan Opera House, a concert by pianist Josef Hofmann - NARA 541890 - Edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 16:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Retouched and nominated by Mmxx -- ■ MMXX ^talk 16:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Previously nominated here as an alt. version but it seems there wasn't enough time for reviewers.
Neutral ■ MMXX ^talk 16:50, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 21:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Without details, faces are blurred or/and overexposed--Miguel Bugallo 01:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 09:11, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ As Bugallo. --217.30.64.34 17:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Please sign in to vote. Tomer T (talk) 21:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support for a restored and historical old image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support As last time --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive -- Martin Kraft (talk) 12:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support WOW! Béria Lima ^msg 19:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:2012-03-07 00-01-29-etang-veronne.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 19:11:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not see anything interesting... and specially, I do not like the colors --Llorenzi (talk) 17:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad colors or WB. -- -donald- (talk) 11:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing original--David საქართველო 11:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull colours. -- Achird (talk) 21:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I just realized that this is a nightshot. -- Achird (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agrias claudina claudina MHNT.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2012 at 19:19:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Positive: valuable rare species, good state. Negative: lack of sharpness in some points, apparent red oversaturation. --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus is an archivist at heart. It's not in his soul to oversaturate an image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support An excellent picture as usualy! -- Achird (talk) 22:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The genus Agrias is Wow. Thank Citron --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Béria Lima ^msg 20:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:39, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --User:Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 9:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Support Totodu74 (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 12:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Calle de Cuetzalan.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 03:21:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 03:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont (talk)21:20 23 Marzo 2012

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coniophara.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 03:34:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 03:34, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont (talk)21:33 23 Marzo 2012

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escalinatas de Yohualichan.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 03:10:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont (talk)21:10 23 Marzo 2012
Comment I'm not sure it's in focus. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Junonia hierta by kadavoor.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 05:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Jkadavoor -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Yellow Pansy (Junonia hierta) is a species of nymphalid butterfly usually seen in open scrub and grassland habitats. I found her perched on a bunch of fallen leaves, absorbing the heat of morning rays; so here also the camera was on the ground and I'm laying behind. :) -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too harsh light. Leave underexposed, background is way too dark IMHO in the upper area and its colours are too similar to the butterfly. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes; but she was really in need for warm lights and that is the only reason she perched there. The background is unfocused rotten leaves; these fearful creatures will perch only where they can blend with the environment. I'm ready to withdraw but like to hear more opinions, please. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - I share Carschten's thoughts too. Light was not ideal to illustrate the subject in this picture. I like the background composition and angle, but not the lighting. Maybe a very gentle flash could have helped a bit. --Paolo Costa (talk) 13:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I think the subject is sufficiently seperated from the background. The colour palette is fine. Composition is excellent. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition. I really like the light. -- Achird (talk) 21:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 12:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:46, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 14:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 22:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:22, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Military laser experiment.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 23:09:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by US Air Force - uploaded by Darz Mol - nominated by It Is Me Here -- It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 23:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 23:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sure, there may be some minor technical details for the pixel peepers to complain about, but this is very interesting photo. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose an impressive picture, but because of the salt and pepper noise. Tomer T (talk) 11:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me it is too noisy. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm uncomfortable with some aspects of the pic. The "source" website only contains a thumbnail and the "larger version" link points to an image that is both slightly smaller than the one here, higher contrast, noisier, brighter and a bit more detail -- but with more noise. Enlarging that one shows they clearly have the same source pic in common. Has someone darkened, reduced the contrast and de-noised the original? It is still a bit noisy despite the apparently heavy reduction. I'm also uncomfortable with the public domain claim because the photographer isn't identified -- it could have been taken by a professional photographer. It is an interesting pic but doesn't really contain more than normal monitor-screen size of detail. Colin (talk) 22:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me, and also salt and pepper noise. I can accept one of them, but not both at the same time. -- Achird (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as others. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2012 at 12:49:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info sculpture by Dantan; photo, upload and nomination by Coyau -- Coyau (talk) 12:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Coyau (talk) 12:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Same opinion I gave at QI:) Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:57, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 00:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --SJ + 04:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 22:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Rialto Gondoliers.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2012 at 17:00:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 20:55, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose I don't like the edges (for example, see notes). I don't like the noise in the walls (notes). And I don't like the detail of the people--Miguel Bugallo 21:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, lean oppose - very nice, but crop slightly too tight on the left and per Miguel, people in foreground are distracting. --Claritas (talk) 11:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 11:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 07:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Yohualichan.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 03:01:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont (talk) 21:00 23 Marzo 2012

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Benny Trapp Anatololacerta oertzeni Rhodos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 09:48:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Benny Trapp - uploaded by Benny Trapp - nominated by Achim Raschka -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achim Raschka (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 09:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 10:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Royalbroil 12:00, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Great picture! - Solar Police►Talk 13:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:55, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achird (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I told you so ;) Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 20:58, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support a great picture.Botend (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 00:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice -- Martin Kraft (talk) 08:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:39, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --H. Krisp (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Totodu74 (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adding to the chorus. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 22:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 12:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Enzauenpark Pforzheim 2011.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 11:13:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created , uploaded and nominated by me. -- Felix König ✉ 11:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -- Felix König ✉ 11:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow for me. Tomer T (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 13:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unclear Subject -- Martin Kraft (talk) 08:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No spectacular image. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein 007.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 19:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein - uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by Martin Kraft -- Martin Kraft (talk) 19:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Kraft (talk) 19:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Tomer T (talk) 22:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Claritas convinced me. Tomer T (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - nothing special. Famous painting, but the quality of this rendition is rather poor compared to what can be achieved with a canvas of this size. --Claritas (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brazos Bend State Park, Pilant Slough.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 01:33:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Jujutacular (talk) 01:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jujutacular (talk) 01:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark, the whole pic, but especially on the right side. -- -donald- (talk) 08:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Donald, large dark area at right, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:51, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GAZ-12 ZIM.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 20:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavily distored. -- -donald- (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 11:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If the car were alone, I would support. And I'd prefer the car not in a garage. --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 13:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:49, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maasriver.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 22:30:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Maastricht. A view to Maas river by night.

Info: created by Grandmaster - uploaded by Grandmaster - nominated by Grandmaster -- Grandmaster 22:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Grandmaster 22:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, can't convince me: overall blueish with only few sources of artificial light, which makes the whole picture somewhat gloomy (twilight / blue hour photographs can be more moody), not very sharp, rather ordinary composition. Just some more than 4MP resolution (Canon EOS 550D can up to 18MP). - A.Savin 15:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unexceptional -- Martin Kraft (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose average quality, poor composition --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:50, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Train by the Durango and Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 01:38:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claritas (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nice composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 13:16, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 16:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 17:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 18:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition --NJR_ZA (talk) 08:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have a feeling it's a bit too noisy on the blacks, but besides that it's a great photo. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 10:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 11:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture and composition. Perhaps lacking a little contrast (blacks not really black). Colin (talk) 21:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective! --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:27, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sadly, I don't like the colours. The whole picture is kind of a little bit greyish. -- Achird (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC) / Or more correctly: The picture is actually a bit too green. There is also a problem with contrast: The locomotive is originally underexposed, so it doesn't have a full range of greyscale and thus becomes grainy when brightening. -- Achird (talk) 21:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow factor! -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Dew on a leaf.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 07:20:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Solar Police - uploaded by Solar Police - nominated by Solar Police -- Solar Police (talk) 07:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Solar Police (talk) 07:20, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - blurred small leaf in foreground is distracting. --Claritas (talk) 11:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy and unsharp. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose color noise, unsharp, but a good idea. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alchemist. --Cayambe (talk) 01:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like leaves colour. --SteGrifo27 (tell me) 12:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Truong Cao dang Su pham Da Lat - Tran Huy Phuong 4.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2012 at 16:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Trần Huy Phương - uploaded by Trần Huy Phương - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The sun flare is a real distraction. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:49, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lense flare and suboptimal light conditions. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korbach, Amtsgericht, 2011-08 CN-01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2012 at 13:23:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Carschten - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 13:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request The image looks a bit over-straigthend. The vertical lines in the far left and right seem to widen to the top, so that the building appears somehow top-heavy. For optical reasons it's better to keep a bit of the natural perspective while straigthening. Maybe you can correct that?! -- Martin Kraft (talk) 07:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice image, with perfectly straight verticals. -- MJJR (talk) 19:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically excellent, but no wow factor to me. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unfavorable perspective for this building. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too strong distorted. --Ralf Roleček 06:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Gareau 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2012 at 06:44:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ~Pyb - uploaded by ~Pyb - nominated by ~Pyb -- ~Pyb (talk) 06:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~Pyb (talk) 06:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 15:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you clean up the spider's web at the back of her neck, below the chin and "remove" the beastie in her eye (a ladybird?). Colin (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- thx for your comment. I've removed the spider's web and the beastie. I'll need more time to clean her chin (my first try is not good).
  - Done ~Pyb (talk) 10:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)~Pyb (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Support The touch-up is slightly visible but not enough to prevent support. Colin (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Léna (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 06:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting allegory of La douleur. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support The kind of pictures I do like very much.--Jebulon (talk) 16:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. --SJ + 04:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 22:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Myrabella (talk) 06:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 11:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Echinopsis flower.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2012 at 17:08:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pottercomuneo - uploaded by Pottercomuneo - nominated by Pottercomuneo -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 17:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 17:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The crop bothers me, because of the cut-off flower on the left-hand side. Quality seems adequate, otherwise. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 11:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unfairly I took this picture 4 years ago, I didn't think about it, and as much unfairly they don't bloom each year :/--Pottercomuneo (talk) 12:02, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Pretty, but bad crop. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nadadores en Acapulco.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2012 at 02:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Noyolcont - uploaded by Noyolcont - nominated by Noyolcont -- Noyolcont (talk) 02:53, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noyolcont (talk)20:52 23 Marzo 2012
Oppose it isn't clear, the sun is a distraction Ezarateesteban 19:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ I think it's a nice, featureable picture. Sun isn't a distraction to me. I would appreciate an English description. Tomer T (talk) 11:54, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I was convinced. Dust spot should be removed. Tomer T (talk) 21:39, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I like it, but it's not good technically. Dust spots, lens flare, and a strange black speck would all need correcting. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed Cathy Richards (talk) 20:47, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Katarighe (Talk) 21:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dolicopodidae.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2012 at 12:24:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Muhammad (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. Tomer T (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Kraft (talk) 12:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support informative and impressive. ----Paolo Costa (talk) 13:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Caption too minimalist. Unable to recognize the species. Too blurred area.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as per above. Cute long-legged fly; no species info, so less EV. Bit more DOF is appreciated. -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Katarighe (Talk) 12:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Might fall short for EV (due to shallow DOF and lack of sharpness and information), but I like the composition and minimalist background - Benh (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unable to recognize the species and not enough sharp. Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 15:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the other picture taken by same contributor is far better: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Long_legged_fly.jpg -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- User:Andrew J.Kurbiko
Oppose Insufficient file description. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice but not FP for me. DOF to low, low sharpnes, unfavorable cut. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose needs id. --Quartl (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Internet map 1024.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2009 at 19:13:28

Info created by Matt Britt - uploaded by Matt Britt - nominated by Sci-Fi Dude -- Sci-Fi Dude (talk) 19:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sci-Fi Dude (talk) 19:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is below size requirements.

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

→Diti the penguin — 19:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\^talk 12:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:New York - Central Park - buildings in fog.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2012 at 04:23:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Paolo Costa (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support i like the fog. --Ralf Roleček 06:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dont like the fog... --Llorenzi (talk) 11:06, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support--David საქართველო 12:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed (esp. the upper fog area is too bright) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Nice idea, but too bright. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Paolo Costa (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]