Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 15:16:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Nepali grandmother preparing food in a traditional kitchen. Created by Mithun Kunwar, edited and uploaded by Radomianin, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The original photograph was one of my personal favourites from Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 – it feels so authentic and is aesthetically very appealing because of the contrasts between light and dark and between warm and cold colours. But the original file was a bit noisy and oversaturated. Radomianin has generously created this edited version which greatly reduces the noise and also tones down the saturation a bit. (Yes, the reds are still very saturated, but IMHO realistic when we consider the combination of the vivid red paint on the wall with the warm light from the fire.) Therefore I am happy to nominate this edited version. – Aristeas (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 14:23:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1899
- Info The Culemborg rail bridge in 1868, just after being completed. It was the longest of its kind in that era. This photo from the inner side features a great perspective, a modern-looking atmosphere, yet the people in the middle reminds us that is still full XIX century | Photo from the National Archives of the Netherlands, originally uploaded by Mr.Nostalgic - cropped and nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 13:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info Medina of Fes (= old, enwalled town of Fes), Marocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 06:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the image, the composition, exposure and the glorious gold colors juxtaposed with the red. I think the "wow" factor exceeds the complications of the long exposure. Some of the monk's heads show motion blur, and one is transparent. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 04:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
- Info Deelerwoud, (the eastern part.) Split birch (probably due to lightning strike) on a heathland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 19:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
- Info African wattled lapwing incubating eggs in the Serengeti National Park. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great perspective, sharp detail, excellent light. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support good pic, nice light --Mile (talk) 07:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 15:29:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
- Info A darter, probably a juvenile Crocothemis erythraea, resting on a clothes line. Notice how the wings are lowered for stability. Photo taken at Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unsual and dynamic pose, nice focus. --C messier (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
White hammer oyster - Malleus albus
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 14:41:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Malleidae
- Info The two valves of a White hammer oyster, Malleus albus; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 10:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 06:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sturnidae_(Starlings)
- Info Superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but the back of the bird isn't in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The eye is in focus, as usually required; the upper back is very sharp with fine feather details and the claw is sharp, too. – If possible, I would consider enlarging the crop a little bit, espec. at the left (lead room). – Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 02:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta
- Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Crop on left could be more wider for some px. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- I took your advice and went back to the original and re-cropped it and uploaded a new version. I think I may have done this wrong. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
- Info Krasnodar Krai / Сreated by HoroshilovAleksandr - uploaded by HoroshilovAleksandr - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Exceedingly overprocessed. File name not in accordance with Commons:File naming guidelines. --Argenberg (talk) 19:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support This image has a big wow factor, especially with the giant gap of light in the sky, the juicy resolution. I was hesitant to upvote because of a raster issue in the middle right of the sky. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Russia is horrifyingly beautiful. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:48:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
- Info Kamchatka / Created by Козинцев - uploaded by Козинцев - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Its a cool photo, but the bottom appears to have a lot of digital artifacts and the mountain isn't really clear. It might be valuable for a page about the South Kamchatka Nature Park, but I don't know that it meets the criteria for FP. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Needsmoreritalin. Looks like it has compression artifacts. Such a pity. --C messier (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support It seems as if the bird is trying to remember something. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes lol El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition, angle, lighting. Exquisite feather detail. Consistent with your style. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support exactly per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 20:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
- Info Sea slug (Goniobranchus gleniei), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This nudibranch has been reported from the Maldives and Tanzania. It can reach 7 centimetres (2.8 in), but the are usually about 4 centimetres (1.6 in) long, and usually feed on sponges. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support It doesn't look real! Cool shot and a very interesting subject too. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Bernard Gotfryd - uploaded by TaurusEmerald - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredibly sharp for the time. -- ★ 13:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --August (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Although there is little space on the left side of the photo (which can be rescued from the original scan) --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Surely not "incredibly sharp for the time", but nonetheless very good. --A.Savin 19:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Does anyone know what kind of film this is? It looks like medium format because of the massive resolution. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good question. The description mentions “35mm (slide format)”, so it’s just full frame. It must be a slide/colour reversal film with low grain and high resolution, therefore a low ISO speed rating, probably 64; and it seems likely that Gotfryd used a Kodak film. Indeed both resolution and colours remind me much of Ektachrome 64 T, the tungsten film variant of the Kodak Ektachrome 64 film. Ektachrome 64/64 T was a very reliable film which survived the heat of an Egyptian summer as well as getting drowned in German rain showers without any colour shift. – 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:52:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
- Info created and uploaded by Lebobito - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice sunset image but IMHO not sufficiently impressive or unique enough to be FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:41:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
- Info Immature male blue dasher (Pachydiplax longipennis). (Mature males are all blue and females are yellow and black throughout). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 13:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support So fuzzy! Not the image, the dragonfly. I never realized they has so many little hairlike structures. Well captured. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support great! Luc Viatour (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 19:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 12:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Poland
- Info While exploring Katowice I came across this lovely view behind a tram stop. From what I understand, locals don't like the Rawa -- it has a long history of being polluted, with one finding in the 90s that it only had 14% water -- but I quite like this overgrown urban scene. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 12:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 12:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice urban scene with a little “lost places” touch; demonstrates what misguided urban planning has done to our watercourses: instead of using them as recreational opportunities and urban oases, we have degraded them to sewers and ultimately harmed ourselves in the process. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 10:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 09:04:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Info Important announcement : POTY scripts have been recently rewritten and an important discussion is ongoing to know if POTY rules should be changed or not. As many people as possible should vote on this page (click here), especially FPC users (just vote, no need for big text). Thank you for your time and I wish you all a beautiful day.
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support And they say that Wattled Starlings are non-migratory. I think they found a transportation loophole. Nice capture. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 22:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Question Are these birds parasites or do they eat ticks? --Wilfredor (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- They eat ticks -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic capture! Very nice meeting place :-) DoF is a bit shallow (F/6.3) for this long focal length, as a result the head is slightly out of focus, unfortunately. However the birds are all very good with a satisfying level of sharpness. It seems that you gave the priority to action with high speed setting (1/2000 sec), that is totally understandable in this complex situation. And the resolution is generous enough, so that the image is awesome at lower size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 07:10:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Building exteriors
- Info created by Samuel Zeller, uploaded by Fæ, nominated by Yann
- Support I am not sure if this is interior or exterior. Does anyone know this place? -- Yann (talk) 07:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Exterior, I think it's the skylight on Basel's exhibition centre, rotated 90º: Google Maps Streetview --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful, great choice of black & white --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great, it looks like a 3D graphic at first glance! Julesvernex2 is right, I think the exact place where it was taken is probably about 60 meters further southwest, contrary to the coordinates given on the file page. It is a tram stop. Personally, I would not classify it as an interior shot. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, fixed. Yann (talk) 08:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support I am sure that the architect would be very happy with how you captured their work. Wonderful image, made more dramatic by choosing to shoot black and white. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. Most other photographs of that skylight emphasize its symmetry, but by tilting the frame the photographer has created a stunning asymmetric composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Different --Wilfredor (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 22:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 19:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
- Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are no FP's of this species. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is nowhere near FP-level. I suggest you withdraw this nomination. Wolverine XI 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Constructive criticism will assist me in nominating high quality images and in capturing better photographs. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I strongly disagree. --Zzzs (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. I'll forgive you. However, I'll suggest to include a reason in your oppose votes so the author can use thr criticism to fix the image. Thanks in advance! Zzzs (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It looks tilted, otherwise fine to me. More information about the location would be good, too. Poco a poco (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting capture, really good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
OpposeTalking about quality, it is very good. For FP - background failed you here, black on black, i can see upper part of bird since its covered. At least some white middle-bellow helped. Also, i hope you wont use 100+ MB for each photo, its around 24 MPx, do we loose so much on jpeg !? --Mile (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)- I see what you are saying. I did shoot at f/4 (Prime lens at 500mm without TC) to focus on the eyes and face of the adult ibis and the exchange of food. As for the PNG, I did a quick check and it seems like I'm the only dork using it. I use PNG for lossless compression, preservation of image quality and colors. Wikipedia's suggestion is JPG, so moving forward I will post JPGs. But my previously uploaded images, already uploaded, may appear on FPC as .PNG.
- Thank you for your thoughtful and considerate feedback. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, now leave as PNG, if you put jpeg over it will take another space so OK now. I will actually remove minus, to neutral. Checked again. --Mile (talk) 07:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 17:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Little bit of an odd image for here: I'd say it's oddly composed but very compelling. Passed En-wiki FPC easily, but Commons evaluates things differently. Vote as you see fit; I shan't take offense, but I would appreciate explanations, because, y'know, there's other images to consider, and having a good idea on how Commons stands helps with pre-filtering them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive illustration of Pentecostal faith/superstition (depending on your own point of view). – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 14:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
- Info created by Rangan Datta Wiki - uploaded by Rangan Datta Wiki - nominated by Rangan Datta Wiki -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Probably the best possible view of this impressive 1906/1907 building (for some details, see e.g. this article). I like the contrast between the ambitious Indo Saracenic building and the modern Kolkata in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support But the file name could be better and the description is very poor of the --Llez (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 17:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral No wow. ★ 17:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Same here, sorry Llez --A.Savin 19:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 06:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States (this gallery has sections for states, but there is currently none for the state in which this image was taken: North Carolina)
- Info created by AHeneen - uploaded by AHeneen - nominated by AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support as creator & nominator. There is a lot of detail in this image, but when viewed at 100% zoom, the sharpness should be OK. In my browser, the "original image" link on its page defaults to a much higher zoom (200%???) in which the sharpness of the trees is not the greatest. The rock face on the left foreground is naturally wet year-round and had a trickle of running water behind a layer of ice, which is why some of the ice against the rock face is dark while icicles hanging close to the rock face are bright from the sunlight shining through them. Image was taken in Nikon RAW format and only editing adjustments were to increase both highlight and shadow protection, increase overall brightness just a little, increase saturation just a little, and change white balance from "auto" to "natural light auto". -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really good composition. The sharpness could be better (f/8?) and a touch of CAs. --XRay 💬 11:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, light, and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Very good composition. But I think it is over-sharpened. Is this intentional? --August (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- It depends on your camera settings and your software when editing. Sharpening can be applied in both stages. August (talk) 22:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral A tad oversharpened. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavily over-sharpened. --August (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 18:12:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
- Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- The byzantine church of Saints Sergius and Bacchus near Kitta, Mani, Greece. Support -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice angle. ★ 22:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 13:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's impressive the high level of details. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 17:28:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
- Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- View of Kavousi, the modern village down the valley, and Azorias, the ancient town lying in ruins on top of the hill to the right, in Eastern Crete, Greece. Support -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent overview of the situation both of the ancient and of the modern village. The photo makes evident why the ancient settlers of Azoria selected that place: it’s easy to defend, still flat enough for safe building, not far away from (rather) fertile ground, and one can spot the approach of enemies very early. – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Drones present an interesting trade-off. You have an opportunity to create an image that tells a story in a way that cannot be done while standing on the ground. This image succeeds in showing the terrain features, the two settlements and the bay. Unfortunately, most drones are like cellphones with wings. But the value of this image I think exceeds the shortcomings of the image sensor. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 19:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 13:11:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info Gephan range on the right bank of the Bhaga River reflected in Gemoor Khar pond, Gemur, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Elevation 3,210 m (10,530 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the contrast between the reflective water and matte algae. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 10:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support What beautiful image --Wilfredor (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The hits keep coming from El Golli Mohamed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice and balanced composition. But the focus is not sitting exactly on the eyes (or sharpness is not that good). Additionally the resolution is medium to low. I can not find anything outstanding here. --August (talk) 10:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Extremely beautiful canid. Wolverine XI 19:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 04:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info Flower of a Anthemis lemon. Focus stack of 44 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. (Perhaps you could remove two stacking errors in the lower middle area, outside the petals on the green background.) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done. Sorry, I didn't see those mistakes. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely level of detail. --C messier (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 22:04:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
- Info created by Scewing - uploaded by LucaLindholm - nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not yet opened at full size but please fix the caption ("In this 2015 discussion you requested to retouch a little bit this awesome image... and here it is, just bettered (and even better categorized on Commons). Now the images are more continous, with quite the same lvl of light. What do you think about this new version?") No idea where this text comes from -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin Oh yes, of course.
- I thought that the section “description” was to present the image here as a candidate, not the description for the image itself. XD LucaLindholm (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Too big to be opened. ★ 22:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar Mmh… I could take off a little bit of quality in order to lessen the file size, and then upload it on a different file page.
- For now let’s concentrate on the img itself and the adjustments made on it. LucaLindholm (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support, I prefer the larger file as you can view smaller versions if it's too big, and zooming in to the full version lets you see some super cool things, like people in different areas of the panorama. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, a little bit “sizey”, but definitely worth it. :D LucaLindholm (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ever if need a massive restored version --Wilfredor (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This is a nice concept. And I liked seeing this. This should be promoted as VI. But the image is a badly / or not even stacked panorama. Doing this today and calling in panorama would not get any support. Additionally the individual frames are in poor condition and not well restored. --August (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the original was way worse. Unfortunately some little part are missing already from the original, because at the time the daguerrotype produced some black areas around the images. The frames theirselves are in the best condition possible for an image of that type and it is just that that is so good: zooming in let's you see so many particular detail that one wouldn't expect. LucaLindholm (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are right. The level of detail is outstanding. August (talk) 19:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the original was way worse. Unfortunately some little part are missing already from the original, because at the time the daguerrotype produced some black areas around the images. The frames theirselves are in the best condition possible for an image of that type and it is just that that is so good: zooming in let's you see so many particular detail that one wouldn't expect. LucaLindholm (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per August. --Milseburg (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support While I do agree that the panorama is badly stacked, note that the image was taken more than 150 years ago. Unless there's a way better example around the same time, I think we should give it some slack. --Zzzs (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Zzzs exactly: I just took off the completely obscured areas with no visual info available. I really don't think there could be a better version than the one that is alrady available here on Commons, because I think that the then photographer thought it was already good in that way. LucaLindholm (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 08:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 11:00:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
- Info Raspberries and blackberries from Srem, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 12:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pictures of food under-represented here, and good focus in this one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop and bad orientation imo. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose The former of what Shagil said. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop --Tagooty (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support To my eyes, it's the crop and the orientation that make this image work. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Agree it's more creative. Same style as Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dish of blueberries.jpg. In painting, artists also voluntarily crop sometimes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support as Julesvernex2 --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't understand this crop. It doesn't reach the FPC standard. After all, this is just a picture a fruits on a table. Easy shot and bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop and composition, as well as plastic disposable containers --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 01:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Valentine Manchon Duchesne - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not a huge fan of the "1 cm" mark in the corner. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. @Urban Versis 32: I'm happy to propose the alternative below if preferred. But it's a useful scale, in my opinion (like here or here), otherwise you wonder what's special in this painting. It's difficult to figure out the proportions without any clue, as it could be a standard 20 by 30 cm, or larger. The scale is discreet in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- That is true. It seems like most prefer the scale, however I will remain neutral on this one and support the alt. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. @Urban Versis 32: I'm happy to propose the alternative below if preferred. But it's a useful scale, in my opinion (like here or here), otherwise you wonder what's special in this painting. It's difficult to figure out the proportions without any clue, as it could be a standard 20 by 30 cm, or larger. The scale is discreet in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support. With scale info has strongest wow-facktor IMO -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per my above comments. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support fine with both -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
- Info Version without scale -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this better. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per my comments on the orig. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support fine with both -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 12:53:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France
- Info created by Dktue - uploaded by Dktue - nominated by Dktue -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- It needs categories. Yann (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Zooming into the photo reveals oversharpening. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive and atmospheric mountain scene. However I agree that there seems to be some oversharpening of noise; it would be nice to mitigate this. Could it be related to tonemapping? Or to problems of the raw image processor with raw images from the Fujifilm X-Trans sensor – I remember having read about that in the past. @Julesvernex2: Can you say if the special ‘worm-like’ structures in the noise are related to problems with processing the raw image files from the X-Trans sensor? – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, those indeed look like Fuji's notorious worms! Adobe's default raw engine does a terrible job with X-Trans files, but there's two ways to get around it: i) Use Adobe's Enhance feature (I see this image was edited in Lightroom's mobile version, not sure if it's already available there); or ii) use another raw processor (e.g., DXO or Capture One). Dktue, if you don't have access to Enhance/DXO/Capture One, I can demosaic the raw file for you and send you a linear DNG file for editing. Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Dear users @Dktue, Urban Versis 32, Aristeas, Yann, and Julesvernex2: If no raw file can be provided, please feel free to use the edited file available at the SwissTransfer link for an update or a derivative. I have done an appropriate, lossless denoising. It would be a pity if this nomination would be burned due to technical problems. Note as per Yann: The categories should be improved. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Radomianin, great job in reworking the JPEG, looks much better! Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: Thank you very much for the explanation and the hints how to handle this problem! @Radomianin: Thank you very much for your improved version – it looks indeed much better. @Dktue: I would suggest just to upload the improved version by Radomianin – this could also help to convince more voters of the photo – and to try Julesvernex2’s hints when this problem returns with further photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for editing! The enhance-details that ususally fixes the Fuji-X-trans-worms is not available on the iPad version of Lightroom. I uploaded the new version of Radomianin, thanks! --Dktue (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: Thank you very much for the explanation and the hints how to handle this problem! @Radomianin: Thank you very much for your improved version – it looks indeed much better. @Dktue: I would suggest just to upload the improved version by Radomianin – this could also help to convince more voters of the photo – and to try Julesvernex2’s hints when this problem returns with further photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Radomianin, great job in reworking the JPEG, looks much better! Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Dear users @Dktue, Urban Versis 32, Aristeas, Yann, and Julesvernex2: If no raw file can be provided, please feel free to use the edited file available at the SwissTransfer link for an update or a derivative. I have done an appropriate, lossless denoising. It would be a pity if this nomination would be burned due to technical problems. Note as per Yann: The categories should be improved. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yup, those indeed look like Fuji's notorious worms! Adobe's default raw engine does a terrible job with X-Trans files, but there's two ways to get around it: i) Use Adobe's Enhance feature (I see this image was edited in Lightroom's mobile version, not sure if it's already available there); or ii) use another raw processor (e.g., DXO or Capture One). Dktue, if you don't have access to Enhance/DXO/Capture One, I can demosaic the raw file for you and send you a linear DNG file for editing. Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very moody capture. Thanks for using the improved version :) -- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good now! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 11:40:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual view of the Coliseum. ★ 18:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is the real Colosseo tilted like the tower in Pisa? --August (talk) 20:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- I used several verticals as a reference point (modern verticals) and the coliseum seems to be slightly tilted but not as much as the pisa tower. The Colosseum is about 40 cm (16 inches) lower on the south side than on the north.[1] Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment OK, as someone who has never ben there, I can not tell exactly if something is wrong here. But I can say the the building on the left is leaning to the left. --August (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 22:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment OK, as someone who has never ben there, I can not tell exactly if something is wrong here. But I can say the the building on the left is leaning to the left. --August (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support per ArionStar. -- Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 01:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition does not convince me. Croped cars also blown white car. Choped building on left - i would crop, it doesnt help to concetrate on vertical to Coloseum. --Mile (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Mile for your comment, I added a alt version based in this comment Wilfredor (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I realise it's not exactly within your control but the parked cars ruin it for me. A shame the local government allows street parking so close to a major monument. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:44, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Alt version
- Info Thanks to Mile comment, I'm adding this alt version cuting the building and the cart, IMHO look more clean centering the Colosseo importance --Wilfredor (talk) 03:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think its beter than above, but will stay Neutral. Still see roof and light choped. Cloning probably would help. --Mile (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment dear Mile, however, IMHO I think there is no way to take a street photo without cutting off a building or a car at some point. Wilfredor (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wilfredor I tried, and something like this , Coloseum must be more in sight, so more light and roand bellow less light, also removed roof, luster of left. You have space to sharpen it, so i did some. This was quick mode. I would enlight Coloseum even more. --Mile (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's right to remove permanent landscape elements like light poles. Wilfredor (talk) 15:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 04:55:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The lighting makes it special for me. Excellent technical quality of the Leica. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Somehow. Tried BW and also one with LOW saturation and like them much more. I would put it in BW. --Mile (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support Although I'd have fixed the perspective Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support The light. – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't understand the angle of view, the slanted base or the sharply plunging lines. --Stepro (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 16 Aug → Wed 21 Aug Sat 17 Aug → Thu 22 Aug Sun 18 Aug → Fri 23 Aug Mon 19 Aug → Sat 24 Aug Tue 20 Aug → Sun 25 Aug Wed 21 Aug → Mon 26 Aug
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 12 Aug → Wed 21 Aug Tue 13 Aug → Thu 22 Aug Wed 14 Aug → Fri 23 Aug Thu 15 Aug → Sat 24 Aug Fri 16 Aug → Sun 25 Aug Sat 17 Aug → Mon 26 Aug Sun 18 Aug → Tue 27 Aug Mon 19 Aug → Wed 28 Aug Tue 20 Aug → Thu 29 Aug Wed 21 Aug → Fri 30 Aug
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/August 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.